- Joined
- Apr 20, 2011
- Messages
- 3,179
- Reaction score
- 2
Those gon be two mighty small girls in the back. Not my thing, personally.
well I definitely dont want my chikies to be bigger than me
hold on: I'm a girl, what do I care?
Those gon be two mighty small girls in the back. Not my thing, personally.
If you can't drive stick you'll be a terrible doctor.
I don't think any doctor will be able to afford these anytime soon.
Ok I'm done...now that I think about it isn't there a car thread in the lounge?
Just bought the car in my avatar about a month and a half ago, manual tranny (my first). It's so funGross.
Manual FTW.
To claim this with such certainty is arrogant.But what happens if regulations are loosened to the point that some foreign doctors can practice medicine in the US without a US residency? How can US doctors make six-figure incomes if we have to compete with Indian doctors on an equal footing? (which is not how it is today, since US med students currently are at a huge advantage when it comes to residencies).
To expect this not to happen in the next 40 years or so is naive.
omg me too
SOUL MATES?????
Those gon be two mighty small girls in the back. Not my thing, personally.
If I was a gunner then why would I consider a DO school instead of an allo school with better opportunities for neurosurgery, derm, radiology, etc.? And if I was a gunner, I would have never gotten low grades in undergrad.
No, he is saying that removing the barriers of foreign doctors to practice in the US will cut down on health care costs by driving down doctor salaries, just as free trade drives down the wages of auto workers. He's not saying it will happen, but he is saying it is a good idea. As health care costs relentlessly rise, that option will become more attractive for the vast majority of Americans.Nope, but he sounds like he doesn't have a clue about medicine if he actually advocated for the abolishing of medical licenses. Just like whoever wrote your website who thinks that indian docs are gonna take over American medicine, lol.
No, he is saying that removing the barriers of foreign doctors to practice in the US will cut down on health care costs by driving down doctor salaries, just as free trade drives down the wages of auto workers. He's not saying it will happen, but he is saying it is a good idea. As health care costs relentlessly rise, that option will become more attractive for the vast majority of Americans.
Stop calling me an idiot, or else I will report you.
http://www.studentdoctor.net/online-service-agreement/
Lamborghini Reventon
Pagani Zonda
Ferrari Enzo
I don't think any doctor will be able to afford these anytime soon.
Ok I'm done...now that I think about it isn't there a car thread in the lounge?
Too ostentatious sir. I'd rather stick with a G37, M3 coupe, or Audi S5. Lambos scream "I can't get laid without this car. I hope my expensive shades/shirt with 3 undone buttons distract you from my premature balding. Please let me buy you things in exchange for sexual encounters".
But society has become much more politically correct over time.A subtle blend of 2 parts racism to 1 part nationalism should counter that for years to come
That's why I said subtle. Overt racism is so 2010. And nationalism will never die. AMURICA!
That's why I said subtle. Overt racism is so 2010. And nationalism will never die. AMURICA!
They could make licensing easier for FMGs, and maybe allow residencies in other countries that meet ACGME standards, so foreign doctors can come to the US and practice medicine right away.So if we don't require FMG's and IMG's to hold a US License, how do we evaluate the competence of foreign doctors from a hundred different training backgrounds, any of which may or may not have been sufficient to engender competence.
Inb4atonofpatientsdie
It depends on the specialty.
If I become an internist, then I expect 120K.
If I become a pathologist, then 140K.
190K for cardiologists and orthopedics.
Maybe 230K for neurosurgeons.
This is what I expect 10 years from now.
Stop calling me an idiot, or else I will report you.
http://www.studentdoctor.net/online-service-agreement/
I find the "time in = money out" fallacy interesting. What about PhD's that do a couple years of post-doc still make far less than attending primary care docs?why do everyone on this thread want to be specialist and bank lmao?
arent most residencies IM or family medicine? (i state this with uncertainty)
if I spend 3 year in residency i want to make about 30% more than a PA or pharmacist (wutever their salaries are)
if I spend 5-7 years in residency i want to make at least twice what PA make.
This is purely because I should be compensated properly for the work i put into.
I think comparing PA to MD is more relevant since most phDs are not in the medical field. Think about it, would it be fair to pay a PA and a IM or family doctor the same wage? or pay specialist and family doc the same thing?I find the "time in = money out" fallacy interesting. What about PhD's that do a couple years of post-doc still make far less than attending primary care docs?
A PA makes about 90K. So you think neurosurgeons and interventional cardiologists who spend 7 years in residency/fellowship should make 180K?why do everyone on this thread want to be specialist and bank lmao?
arent most residencies IM or family medicine? (i state this with uncertainty)
if I spend 3 year in residency i want to make about 30% more than a PA or pharmacist (wutever their salaries are)
if I spend 5-7 years in residency i want to make at least twice what PA make.
This is purely because I should be compensated properly for the work i put into.
I just say "at least" twice, it might happen in the future who know, i feel like if i choose the long road, by the time i get established the whole system gonna change dramatically since the current system is inadequate and it is getting worse and worse with more babyboomers getting old and all the medicaid medicare funding running out...A PA makes about 90K. So you think neurosurgeons and interventional cardiologists who spend 7 years in residency/fellowship should make 180K?
Sounds low, but it could happen in the future if the government clamps down on physician income.
For all these huge income drops to pass, we'd have to have a government that either hates doctors, or wants to clamp down on the top 5-10% of Americans in general. Because in the past 30 years, the political establishment has favored the wealthy as well as the most educated professionals. Doctors have mostly done well, with the exceptions being family practitioners and cardiothoracic surgeons. Since American politics is so turbulent (it took 2 years to go from Obama ushering in a new liberal era, to a Tea Party Republican rout), and since the diminishing middle class is a revolt waiting to happen, I wouldn't be too excited about making 250K+, regardless of specialty. Once pro-middle class politicians are elected, they will soak the rich, and likely target doctors as well by cutting reimbursements and opening up doctor immigration (as well as other professions), or by allowing DNPs to call themselves "physicians". The increasing disparity of wealth in the past 30 years isn't sustainable in any society, and something has to give, whether it be social unrest or a political revolution or both.
The point I was making was that compensation is more related to scope of responsibility and expertise than actual time in training.I think comparing PA to MD is more relevant since most phDs are not in the medical field. Think about it, would it be fair to pay a PA and a IM or family doctor the same wage? or pay specialist and family doc the same thing?
obviously less people (some1 will do it) would become specialist and then we would have a shortage of specialists, thus the specialist wage would go up...
plus, i dont think the average postdoc are time-intensive as a medical residency. phD wage are justified because they are sort of in control of how much they make because their income can come from many sources.
The point I was making was that compensation is more related to scope of responsibility and expertise than actual time in training.