Hey everyone,
I was hoping to submit an update to schools (both pre and post II) about a publication I had accepted on which I am second author. It was basically a retrospective review of several hundred patients with a certain condition at our hospital. The paper highlights a newly found correlation that has not been explored before and was accepted by a solid journal (but not Nature or Science or anything crazy haha). From what I've read on here, a publication could be helpful in tipping the scales in an applicant's favor, but I am wondering if that mostly applies to basic science pubs? Do you think a retrospective study paper is worth submitting? If it matters at all, this is my first publication.
Thank you all for your help!
I was hoping to submit an update to schools (both pre and post II) about a publication I had accepted on which I am second author. It was basically a retrospective review of several hundred patients with a certain condition at our hospital. The paper highlights a newly found correlation that has not been explored before and was accepted by a solid journal (but not Nature or Science or anything crazy haha). From what I've read on here, a publication could be helpful in tipping the scales in an applicant's favor, but I am wondering if that mostly applies to basic science pubs? Do you think a retrospective study paper is worth submitting? If it matters at all, this is my first publication.
Thank you all for your help!