What I'm trying to say is that, from a patient's perspective, when different providers are telling you different things, it causes confusion. This confusion leads to doubt towards medical professionals. Like, one doctor tells you that you are sick and need to spend thousands of dollars on treatment, and then another doctor tells you everything is fine and you don't need to do anything.
I guess you'll disclose more, but I'm confused about your perspective in this essay: are you the caregiver/patient, or are you the shadowing/observing aspiring doctor?
This doctor told me this based on stuff that happened in his experience
The example I want to talk about is how a doctor recounted to me an experience he had where this miscommunication happened. He told me that this sort of thing leads to doubt towards the medical profession, and I could see how that may be the case. I'm not trying to say that I saw a doctor do something and I made a judgement about them.
Okay, first off, hearsay doesn't make an effective personal statement... because it's just not personal.
What do you mean by this? The doctor recounted to me a story of how there was a miscommunication with a patient once. He basically said to me, "this is a lesson I want to teach you, miscommunication like this can cause confusion for patients and can make them start having doubts about the medical profession".
That's great. You'll also learn this while you're in medical school. Or go through residency. Or as a bonafide physician. That's why oral communications skills are important. But I'm not learning anything new about you and your interest in going into medicine from the story as you have described it.
I could see how this is an issue. Doctors often come from science backgrounds, and maybe they sometimes forget that the lay public has not gone through medical school. Even though the patient nods as you explain to them what's going on, it doesn't mean they understand. Also, I could see how the doctor would be viewed as an authority figure, and the patient might not feel comfortable questioning them (even though the doctors have said two different things)
This sounds like a great article for a blog post on SDN. But that said, this is odd if you want to use it for your personal statement.
And don't offend anyone you haven't met by saying "doctors often come from science backgrounds." Sure, you're right, but what's the point that you insinuate with the rest of the paragraph? Some doctors with non-science, humanities/social science backgrounds also may have difficulty communicating with patients.
EDIT: I just re-read where I wrote about this in a secondary I already submitted, and I realized that the way it's written makes it sound like I'm questioning what the physician did......pretty ironic that I'm writing about good communication when I can't seem to communicate my ideas clearly.
I think it's always ironic when I read essays where the author writes about communication as a competency. You have to really convince me you know what you're talking about because many of those essays are not clear, concise, or well-written, bringing their entire essay into question that they're just trying to play to "the checklist" of what my committee wants to hear rather than being honest about their own thoughts and feelings to share with the committee.