... I have worked with could not make it in private practice either because they have such bad attitudes and like to cause drama or because they are extremely lazy.
good thread to vent. i agree with most of what's been said here.
i don't know if it's laziness, though. usually, i don't think it is. i think it's more about inefficiency and lack of pressure in getting cases turned around because of the "academic" nature of the practice. safety is always the number one pursuit in our profession, but my frustration usually arises with what i feel are inefficient anesthetic plans.
for example, i recently got into a "discussion" with an attending concerning a young, otherwise healthy patient who was going to have a mass excised from his leg in our outpatient surgery center. the guy was very nervous, and had already taken his daily xanax in the morning. i started the i.v., planned on just doing a propofol "stun" when they injected the local, and then light sedation (as i've done literally dozens of times before) during the case. he didn't want to remember the procedure. fine. propofol would take care of that. MAC with standby. standard asa monitors. my plan was to get the guy to the PACU and out the door as rapidly as possible.
well, my attending insisted that we give the guy midazolam on top of his home alprazolam. apparently, midazolam (in many people's minds) is a perfectly acceptable substitute for actually having to talk with a patient and use positive patient interaction as your anxiolysis. it get's better. he then further insisted that i use alfentanil prior to the injection of the local so he wouldn't "feel the injection" of the local anesthetic. i said, "well, he certainly won't remember it with the propofol. do you have particular concern about a healthy, active albeit anxious 36-year-old's cardiovascular status?"
so, what was the end result? an extended PACU stay with significant post-op nausea and dry heaves. what's worse? this particular attending, normally a reasonable guy who's expertise is doing more complex cases in the main hospital, repeatedly defended his decision. i explained that i'd always had good experience with propofol only, especially with such a procedure. i reminded him that propofol, in and of itself, has anti-emetic properties. i told him that many of our other attendings would also have done the case with propofol only. i asked him why he thought his plan was better. he told me that it was his "experience" in talking with his patients afterwards that they preferred his method. at that point i just smiled and didn't say anything else. hey, his name was on the anesthetic record as the responsible party.
only 4 months 'til i'm on my own...