- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey, I've been accepted for the Army and Air Force HPSP. It's starting to turn to decision time and I'm trying to weigh all of my factors. I have a question about the residency selection and then I wouldn't mind some more input on each branch.
The Army has a lot of facilities and residencies for nearly every specialty. The Air Force is geared a lot more towards primary care and thus they even have civilian deferment as one of their options, correct? Whereas in the Army you would have to fail to be selected for the military residencies to get a civilian deferment, right? And with the purported demise of the GMO, failure to get a military residency in any branch should mean a transitional year and then civilian deferment.
If I have that right, then I'd love to know your opinion on which branch has the better option. Are the Army (and Air Force for that matter) residency programs all strong enough to compete with their civilian counterparts? There is a lot of talk in these threads about life after residency in the military. I would like to hear more about your experiences in a military residency.
Also, could the lack of military residency slots for Air Force actually be a benefit as you would have a better chance of deferring to the civilian residency of your choice and essentially turning their HPSP into a better version of the FAP? If I'm wrong about the residencies then of course I'd like to be corrected.
There is also that "needs of the military" clause present in all three branches which is very intimidating. All of the information brackets all contain "iffy" phrases like "if you don't match for one of your 5 program choices you normally go to a civilian residency" or "often... you get to defer"[emphasis mine]. I can never seem to get a straight answer. Have there been people forced to go into a specialty that they did not choose based "on the needs of the military"? I hope your experience can help me on this point.
The Army has a lot of facilities and residencies for nearly every specialty. The Air Force is geared a lot more towards primary care and thus they even have civilian deferment as one of their options, correct? Whereas in the Army you would have to fail to be selected for the military residencies to get a civilian deferment, right? And with the purported demise of the GMO, failure to get a military residency in any branch should mean a transitional year and then civilian deferment.
If I have that right, then I'd love to know your opinion on which branch has the better option. Are the Army (and Air Force for that matter) residency programs all strong enough to compete with their civilian counterparts? There is a lot of talk in these threads about life after residency in the military. I would like to hear more about your experiences in a military residency.
Also, could the lack of military residency slots for Air Force actually be a benefit as you would have a better chance of deferring to the civilian residency of your choice and essentially turning their HPSP into a better version of the FAP? If I'm wrong about the residencies then of course I'd like to be corrected.
There is also that "needs of the military" clause present in all three branches which is very intimidating. All of the information brackets all contain "iffy" phrases like "if you don't match for one of your 5 program choices you normally go to a civilian residency" or "often... you get to defer"[emphasis mine]. I can never seem to get a straight answer. Have there been people forced to go into a specialty that they did not choose based "on the needs of the military"? I hope your experience can help me on this point.