- Joined
- Jun 3, 2006
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey, I was just looking for some input from anybody who has used EK materials for prior MCATs. Rather than taking a course, I decided to trust amazon.com customer reviews, which basically touted EK stuff as the only thing you needed. Anyways, I'm shooting for the August test date, and I'm about 6 weeks into studying with EK stuff (I bought the complete prep set, the 1001 questions set, and AAMC tests 4-9).
Now here's my dilemma; 6 weeks into studying, with about 6 weeks left, I'm probably about 75% done with content review. All of a sudden it hit me today that I've been putting a LOT of trust in EK stuff. i.e. I'm fully trusting that they're giving me all the info that I need to do well (36+), and anything that they don't cover won't be necessary for the MCAT. I'm starting to get a bit worried about taking such a gamble with my score. All of my friends who are taking the mcat or who have taken the mcat in the past have taken a course, and from what I can tell, they're getting a much more in-depth science review than what I'm getting with EK.
So my question is, have any of you out there who have studied EXCLUSIVELY with EK stuff and AAMC tests managed to do well on prior MCATs? I haven't touched anything but EK stuff or aamc tests, and if you could let me know if I really need to hit the textbooks regarding certain topics, or invest in a TPR or Kaplan comprehensive review book, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks a bunch.
Now here's my dilemma; 6 weeks into studying, with about 6 weeks left, I'm probably about 75% done with content review. All of a sudden it hit me today that I've been putting a LOT of trust in EK stuff. i.e. I'm fully trusting that they're giving me all the info that I need to do well (36+), and anything that they don't cover won't be necessary for the MCAT. I'm starting to get a bit worried about taking such a gamble with my score. All of my friends who are taking the mcat or who have taken the mcat in the past have taken a course, and from what I can tell, they're getting a much more in-depth science review than what I'm getting with EK.
So my question is, have any of you out there who have studied EXCLUSIVELY with EK stuff and AAMC tests managed to do well on prior MCATs? I haven't touched anything but EK stuff or aamc tests, and if you could let me know if I really need to hit the textbooks regarding certain topics, or invest in a TPR or Kaplan comprehensive review book, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks a bunch.