If you insist on calling PA/NP's mid-levels, I will assume you're a fascist.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,567
Reaction score
6,963
Letter to the editor: Nurse practitioners are not 'mid-level' providers
Colleen Chierici, BSN, RN; Aney Abraham, DNP, NE-BC, RN; Lynne Braun, PhD, CNP, FAHA, FAANP, FPCNA, FAAN; Raechel Ferry-Rooney, DNP, APRN, ANP-BC; Ingrid Forsberg, DNP, APRN, FNP-BC; Terry Gallagher, DNP, APRN, FNP-BC; Angela Moss, PhD, APRN, ANP-BC - yesterday Print | Email


Fifteen physicians are expected to be let go from the suburban Edward-Elmhurst Hospital in the next year, as reported by Becker's Hospital Review. These physicians, who work in immediate care clinics, will be replaced by nurse practitioners.

This has understandably upset physicians and hearing of anyone losing their job is distressing. But as a group of nurse practitioners, we take umbrage with two things: the use of the term "mid-level" by Becker's and the implication patients are being put in danger by this decision.

The term "mid-level" is outdated and derogatory toward nurse practitioners because it suggests that the care they provide is not "high-level."


Nurse practitioners, trained at the masters and doctoral level, are visited 1.06 billion times a year by patients. In addition to being healthcare providers, nurse practitioners educate, innovate, conduct research and are involved with the development of health policy at the state and federal level.

Since the introduction of the role of the nurse practitioner in 1965, researchers have rigorously studied the quality of care nurse practitioners provide as well as their outcomes. This large body of research has consistently demonstrated that nurse practitioners provide safe, effective, patient centered, timely and efficient care.

A 2014 study demonstrated a link between nurse practitioners having full practice authority and a decrease in readmission rates for Medicare-Medicaid patients. Readmission rates are one of the quality indicators CMS uses to gauge the safety and efficacy of hospitals.

A 2012 study from Australia demonstrated similar patient outcomes between physicians and nurse practitioners in a fast-track emergency department, although the nurse practitioners had higher patient satisfaction rates. Similarly, in critical care settings, nurse practitioners have demonstrated improved time to consultation/treatment, mortality, cost savings and patient satisfaction.

Nurse practitioners are 25 percent of healthcare providers in rural America, where access to care has been a long-standing problem and healthcare providers are desperately needed. The number of nurse practitioners in rural practice settings increased 43.2 percent between 2008 and 2016.

Nurse practitioners also fill critical healthcare gaps in densely populated areas, and particularly so among the most vulnerable such as low-income families, immigrants, and persons suffering from homelessness, mental illness, and substance abuse. In Illinois, approximately 50 percent of the nearly 4,000 Illinois-licensed nurse practitioners provide care in the Chicago metro area and do so among some of the city's neediest populations.

The high quality care that nurse practitioners bring to healthcare was recognized by the Department of Veterans Affairs in 2016. The VA announced full practice authority for advanced practice nurses, joining the now 20 states with full practice authority in the United States. With this policy change the VA recognized that nurse practitioners provide safe and effective primary care while improving patient access to care.

To be sure, all members of the healthcare team are valued and indispensable to producing excellent outcomes for our patients. We are disappointed our physician colleagues have been laid off as many of us work alongside physicians in equitable practice-settings.

But the care nurse practitioners provide is not "mid-level," nor are we physician replacements.
We have our own clearly defined profession and our goal is to provide the highest standard of care to patients whether that is inpatient or outpatient, rural or urban areas. There is plenty of work for us all — our patients need us.

All authors are faculty, nurses and nurse practitioner clinicians at Rush University College of Nursing and Rush Health in Chicago.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I just threw up in my mouth
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
Where is the word "fascist" in all of this? I cannot find it. Skimmed it twice. BTW any doc can be replaced by a nurse or a PA or whatever - it is simply a question of legality and quality. Someone is employing all of these nurses and probably making a boat load of money and is also probably an MD. If you want to get angry at someone, figure out who that person is. I doubt it is a nurse.
 
Where is the word "fascist" in all of this? I cannot find it. Skimmed it twice. BTW any doc can be replaced by a nurse or a PA or whatever - it is simply a question of legality and quality. Someone is employing all of these nurses and probably making a boat load of money and is also probably an MD. If you want to get angry at someone, figure out who that person is. I doubt it is a nurse.

"Fascists" have been accused of advancing ideologies based upon "hierarchy" and "natural orders" and "meritocracy." This essay advances the idea that we should change our language to erase distinctions between levels of expertise in order to promote "equity." By inference, not doing so would promote "inequity." Promoting "inequity" based upon real or perceived differences has been labeled "fascist" by various progressive groups.
 
i guess "provider" by itself wasnt available?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
"Fascists" have been accused of advancing ideologies based upon "hierarchy" and "natural orders" and "meritocracy." This essay advances the idea that we should change our language to erase distinctions between levels of expertise in order to promote "equity." By inference, not doing so would promote "inequity." Promoting "inequity" based upon real or perceived differences has been labeled "fascist" by various progressive groups.
What i have never figured out is why Left leaning voters deride something as "Fascist". Fascism is a form of Socialism. Hitler and Mussolini both were Socialists early in their careers. If the Left wants to deride the Meritocracy, they need to come up with a new term. "Meritocrat" might work. As in "you dirty Meritocrat". Or "die Meritocratic dog". Good article that explains some of this. It might piss you off but it was informative to me. How Life Became an Endless, Terrible Competition
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
When the letters after your name are longer than your name, I don't take you seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users
We have visited this before. I looked at the DNP curriculum at several top programs (Hopkins, Duke, Yale).

There is literally less than 10% of the DNP curriculum that addresses actual clinical care. It is all health policy, economics, research, etc. But now they want to be called ‘doctor’. Misleading.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I feel like what the NP lobby perennially misunderstands is the term "midlevel" refers to education, i.e. NP education is mid-way between that of a physician and an RN. That much is simply objective fact- if it bothers you so much, make your education more rigorous, outlaw online degree mills, etc

"Everybody wanna be a doctor, but don't nobody wanna go to medical school" - Ronnie Coleman
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
I feel like what the NP lobby perennially misunderstands is the term "midlevel" refers to education, i.e. NP education is mid-way between that of a physician and an RN. That much is simply objective fact- if it bothers you so much, make your education more rigorous, outlaw online degree mills, etc

"Everybody wanna be a doctor, but don't nobody wanna go to medical school" - Ronnie Coleman

that’s it. No more “mid level,” will only use “low level.” It is a Better reflection of the training and the distance between nurse and doctor.
 
We have a doc that is around 75 and still practicing. I was reading one of his notesAnd he referred to one of the NPs as a “second tier provider”.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users
Top