- Joined
- May 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1,616
- Reaction score
- 38
IR is the best. The answer is always 3500 nm, 1700 nm, or both.
I especially love the spectroscopy stuff on the MCAT -- basically a giveaway.
IR is the best. The answer is always 3500 nm, 1700 nm, or both.
I had a friend of mine come with me to lecture for a week when he came to visit us. He's the TA for ochem at his school, and even he found out lectures wildly confusing and full of errors (when learning carbonyl chemistry, the first day of lecture our prof. accidentally explained to us why the carbon acted as the nucleophile). It's no wonder I used to walk out of that class every day shaking my head in confusion.
I didn't understand NMR until I actually did one in the lab. It's actually pretty amazing stuff.I actually found NMR to be among the easier/more interesting topics in ochem. Like others noted, the multi-step backwards synthesis problems were more annoying.
I didn't understand NMR until I actually did one in the lab. It's actually pretty amazing stuff.
I hate NMR, I worked in synthetic chemistry for a year after graduation and have read enough NMRs that I never want to see another one again for the rest of my life.
Um...you realize that this thread is from a year ago, right? OP just commented like 5 posts ago and said that they were done with it...
organic was not that hard people. Christ.
Maybe because it's usually the first 'hard' class most people take?Agreed. There are much harder classes, but for some reason everyone gets all worked up about organic.
organic was not that hard people. Christ.
Pfft. My advice is timeless
Seriously though, I just didn't notice; the last several posts were from the same day.
It's not really THAT bad, it's more just that you have to do them almost every day. On giant compounds. And unlike the stuff you make in orgo lab or do on an exam, the NMRs don't usually turn out perfect because you usually have a small amount of pure product, and there are a ton of other random impurities that you may not be able to get out with HPLC. But I did maybe 3-4 NMRs a week, so I suppose it wasn't really that bad. Preparing a sample, running across campus to the machine, taking the spectra, and reading it gets very old though. And nothing is worse than reading the NMR and finding out that you basically just have starting material.true. needs to be taught better tho!
hahaha, that bad?
It's not really THAT bad, it's more just that you have to do them almost every day. On giant compounds. And unlike the stuff you make in orgo lab or do on an exam, the NMRs don't usually turn out perfect because you usually have a small amount of pure product, and there are a ton of other random impurities that you may not be able to get out with HPLC. But I did maybe 3-4 NMRs a week, so I suppose it wasn't really that bad. Preparing a sample, running across campus to the machine, taking the spectra, and reading it gets very old though. And nothing is worse than reading the NMR and finding out that you basically just have starting material.
In our organic chemistry we never did NMR's.
Did you go to a Community college or something? NMR's are basic orgo II. Did you not do SN1/SN2 either?
Did you go to a Community college or something? NMR's are basic orgo II. Did you not do SN1/SN2 either?
Nope, I'm in a 4 year institution. We never did a single lick of NMR's.
Thats strange. I thought everyone did NMR during orgo I.
NMR and spectroscopy was the last chapter we covered in Ochem 1.
Subsequently, every chapter in Ochem 2 had questions concerning the interpretation of NMRs.
We used the McMurray text in Ochem 1. We did NMR midway through the semester and then did chirality and then reactions involving chirality, the Diels-Alder reaction and a couple other things.
Regardless NMR is a large part of NMR.
weirdIn our organic chemistry we never did NMR's.
In our organic chemistry we never did NMR's.
Do you mean in lab or in the lecture?
I have literally done 0 NMR. We skipped that chapter. I don't even know what NMR is besides the small bit I did in research.