Inflation, Interest Rates and the Economy for 2025

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
😂 i didnt say “crypto”. I said bitcoin. And for the long term bitcoin is very predictable. Sure its more volatile on a scale days to weeks. Right now is the exact time to buy bitcoin. We’re at the bottom going into a bull market. What, pray tell, is bad advice? Im going to laugh at you in November after I make a killing.

Current price of Bitcoin is hovering around 100k.

Now's the time to buy? I'm a long term investor. Mainly wanting to hold for my kids.

Currently have a small position in Bitcoin stored in a physical wallet.
 
Current price of Bitcoin is hovering around 100k.

Now's the time to buy? I'm a long term investor. Mainly wanting to hold for my kids.

Currently have a small position in Bitcoin stored in a physical wallet.
If looking to take advantage of the bull run, 75k a few weeks ago would have been ideal but nows a great time.
 
Last edited:
😂 i didnt say “crypto”. I said bitcoin. And for the long term bitcoin is very predictable. Sure its more volatile on a scale days to weeks. Right now is the exact time to buy bitcoin. We’re at the bottom going into a bull market. What, pray tell, is bad advice? Im going to laugh at you in November after I make a killing.
That's true and I should've specified. I'm just warning people because I also was told to buy a few years ago right at the top which was around 75k I think. Like ya, if you're gonna buy and not look at it for 10 years then sure, you should buy. But, it's not always a good time to buy, buy, buy and I'm personally sitting this one out despite the "bullrun" comments I see everywhere (hint: I saw the same thing a few years ago right at the top). It probably will go higher, but how much higher and how much lower once the bear hits?
 
That's true and I should've specified. I'm just warning people because I also was told to buy a few years ago right at the top which was around 75k I think. Like ya, if you're gonna buy and not look at it for 10 years then sure, you should buy. But, it's not always a good time to buy, buy, buy and I'm personally sitting this one out despite the "bullrun" comments I see everywhere (hint: I saw the same thing a few years ago right at the top). It probably will go higher, but how much higher and how much lower once the bear hits?
Typically when the bear market hits it drops to around the previous cycle top. My strategy is long term HODL but sell maybe 10-15% at the market tops to take profit, then buy back in during bear market. I think i mentioned this before but I treat bitcoin as a reserve asset. Meaning overall never gonna sell it. If I ever need to I can leverage it; borrow against it, etc. but never ever sell bitcoin.
 
Only people who dont understand bitcoin say this kind of stuff. There will be a supply shock here in the next few years once all the bitcoin is all bought up and the price will skyrocket.

My portfolio is diversified but Im a bitcoin maximalist. Once you understand the history of money and monetary policy its impossible not to see the writing on the wall.

Bitcoin is not worth 100k. Its priceless. A currency which cannot be debased, is decentralized, operates on consensus, is portable, liquid, un-censorable, durable, etc etc. Priceless. Look I always say follow the money. Theres a good reason why microstrategy and blackrock are buying like lunatics.
You on here like some kind of guru messiah and then you quote a prediction from cathy wood next page... the irony
 
You on here like some kind of guru messiah and then you quote a prediction from cathy wood next page... the irony
Hey man, do whatever you want. Cathy wood is just one of many. Anyone who knows anything in finance is bullish on bitcoin. Obviously do your own research and make your own decision.
 
Hey man, do whatever you want. Cathy wood is just one of many. Anyone who knows anything in finance is bullish on bitcoin. Obviously do your own research and make your own decision.
I have some % bitcoin. But its my gambling account.
The way you talk of it implies it's done and dusted. It barely existed 10 years ago. Covid enabled its real growth for good or ill...

But you don't even address the trump effect of crypto. Where would btc be if trump wasn't elected? If what he has done isn't insider trading then what is? What will happen in 3 years if his guy brownnose vance doesn't get in?

Theres so many ways this could play out. Your way is only one. Not everyone agrees with you. And if cathy wood pushes it that's reason enough to steer clear.

She is either the worst investor ever or a crook. I kinda hope she's a crook honestly
 
I have some % bitcoin. But its my gambling account.
The way you talk of it implies it's done and dusted. It barely existed 10 years ago. Covid enabled its real growth for good or ill...

But you don't even address the trump effect of crypto. Where would btc be if trump wasn't elected? If what he has done isn't insider trading then what is? What will happen in 3 years if his guy brownnose vance doesn't get in?

Theres so many ways this could play out. Your way is only one. Not everyone agrees with you. And if cathy wood pushes it that's reason enough to steer clear.

She is either the worst investor ever or a crook. I kinda hope she's a crook honestly
None of that matters with btc. If you understood block chain tech and the fact that bitcoin cannot be regulated or censored, you would not be saying any of this. Has nothing to do with who is in office. I mean its nice to have a pro crypto admin, but it has had very little effect thus far. No idea what you’re talking about with “trump effect”. There is no trump effect. Bitcoin is predictably following its cycle which is based on its mining halvings. Is Michael Saylor a bad investor? Larry Fink? Even Warren Buffet admits he was wrong about bitcoin. At what point will you skeptics do a deep dive and realize you are wrong? Okay so when we get to November and bitcoin has reached my absolute base case of 140k, what will you say then?
 
None of that matters with btc. If you understood block chain tech and the fact that bitcoin cannot be regulated or censored, you would not be saying any of this. Has nothing to do with who is in office. I mean its nice to have a pro crypto admin, but it has had very little effect thus far. No idea what you’re talking about with “trump effect”. There is no trump effect. Bitcoin is predictably following its cycle which is based on its mining halvings. Is Michael Saylor a bad investor? Larry Fink? Even Warren Buffet admits he was wrong about bitcoin. At what point will you skeptics do a deep dive and realize you are wrong? Okay so when we get to November and bitcoin has reached my absolute base case of 140k, what will you say then?

120-140 this year will convince no one that isn't on board and they may laugh and say "it only barely doubled in the last 4 years so its probably no better than VOO going forward

I think when gas posters in 2029 are going PT bc of this investment it will start turning more heads.
 
Last edited:
None of that matters with btc. If you understood block chain tech and the fact that bitcoin cannot be regulated or censored, you would not be saying any of this. Has nothing to do with who is in office. I mean its nice to have a pro crypto admin, but it has had very little effect thus far. No idea what you’re talking about with “trump effect”. There is no trump effect. Bitcoin is predictably following its cycle which is based on its mining halvings. Is Michael Saylor a bad investor? Larry Fink? Even Warren Buffet admits he was wrong about bitcoin. At what point will you skeptics do a deep dive and realize you are wrong? Okay so when we get to November and bitcoin has reached my absolute base case of 140k, what will you say then?
You think stock market valuations are based on facts, and products having good tech?
Interesting.
some would call that naieve.
Buddy the stock market doesn't care...

If only it were so easy...

This may go to the moon like you say but is definitely not because it's a good technology.
 
You think stock market valuations are based on facts, and products having good tech?
Interesting.
some would call that naieve.
Buddy the stock market doesn't care...

If only it were so easy...

This may go to the moon like you say but is definitely not because it's a good technology.
😂 no. Just no. I strongly suggest reading a bit on money itself. As in, what makes a good money, the history of money and monetary policy etc. And then, how the bitcoin block chain solves a major problem with all previous forms of money. Its literally the best form of money ever created. Sure, its behaving similar to a stock rn. But bitcoin is a commodity, not a security. Its a lot more like gold than it is a stock. Its still in its relative infancy. Don't make the foolish mistake of thinking it will behave like a stock forever guy. But hey, whatever you think and wanna do.

You need to first understand what it means to be the first truly and purely decentralized form of money that operates on a consensus mechanism, meaning that before a transaction is added to the chain, where it stays forever, all computer nodes on the blockchain have to agree to it and verify it independently. This is the beauty of it and what makes it priceless.
 
Last edited:
😂 no. Just no. I strongly suggest reading a bit on money itself. As in, what makes a good money, the history of money and monetary policy etc. And then, how the bitcoin block chain solves a major problem with all previous forms of money. Its literally the best form of money ever created. Sure, its behaving similar to a stock rn. But bitcoin is a commodity, not a security. Its a lot more like gold than it is a stock. Its still in its relative infancy. Don't make the foolish mistake of thinking it will behave like a stock forever guy. But hey, whatever you think and wanna do.

You need to first understand what it means to be the first truly and purely decentralized form of money that operates on a consensus mechanism, meaning that before a transaction is added to the chain, where it stays forever, all computer nodes on the blockchain have to agree to it and verify it independently. This is the beauty of it and what makes it priceless.

What are your thoughts on the Bitcoin security budget problem?
 
Market opened low and then blew off the debt downgrade like a bug hitting the windshield doing 70. Last Monday was an inflection point of resistance and trendlines coming together that I thought the market would fail, but I live by the chart and die by the chart and that breakout looks real and the market looks strong so I won't volunteer to get run over by a train.

I don't want to get too far ahead of this as it still could easily reverse, but there is a 1995 "irrational exuberance" feel to this market. Lots of similarities. Breakouts from major trendlines and resistance. I mean we're talking a serious attempt to bust out of a 100 year channel and stay out of it. Very fully valued markets both times that defied logic to go higher. Internet infancy and excitement then, ai infancy and excitement now.

But don't forget, Greenspan was right in 1996, the entire 95-00 manic run was irrational exuberance as markets and valuations crashed starting in 2000 with a full return to original Shiller PE ratio and an 80% NASDAQ drop. One thing making a similar irrational run less likely is nobody investing in the late 90s was investing in the 1920s. The 1929 crash was some distant fairly tale to them. Not so today. Investors remember the dot com market idiocy, so will they repeat similar irrationality so soon, and with debt and world issues worse today? Interesting times.
 
😂 no. Just no. I strongly suggest reading a bit on money itself. As in, what makes a good money, the history of money and monetary policy etc. And then, how the bitcoin block chain solves a major problem with all previous forms of money. Its literally the best form of money ever created. Sure, its behaving similar to a stock rn. But bitcoin is a commodity, not a security. Its a lot more like gold than it is a stock. Its still in its relative infancy. Don't make the foolish mistake of thinking it will behave like a stock forever guy. But hey, whatever you think and wanna do.

You need to first understand what it means to be the first truly and purely decentralized form of money that operates on a consensus mechanism, meaning that before a transaction is added to the chain, where it stays forever, all computer nodes on the blockchain have to agree to it and verify it independently. This is the beauty of it and what makes it priceless.
One thing I would caution you on is nothing except death is a sure thing looking forward, particularly as far forward as you're looking. I admire your research and you make good points, but there are reasons for opposing views as well, and nothing, especially huge forward expectations, is in the bag till it's in the bag.
 
One thing I would caution you on is nothing except death is a sure thing looking forward, particularly as far forward as you're looking. I admire your research and you make good points, but there are reasons for opposing views as well, and nothing, especially huge forward expectations, is in the bag till it's in the bag.
Yea for sure. I definitely agree. And thank you for the compliment. I do also acknowledge there are valid opposing arguments, but when you've done as much footwork on bitcoin as I have its difficult to deny its the next step in the evolution of money. I feel like I have a conviction to spread the word of bitcoin to my fellow docs. Even if they arent always willing to listen. 😉
 
What are your thoughts on the Bitcoin security budget problem?
Its a somewhat valid concern. But we're talking about something that is largely theoretical at present. Eventually the onus on security will fall on large scale bitcoin holders like countries, and companies as opposed to miners presently. In order to mount the "51% attack" required to corrupt bitcoin, the resources required are staggering currently. Like beyond physically possible. In the future if you had a quantum computer your chances go up significantly but nobody has those yet. I suspect that once quantum computers become more mainstream, those organizations who hold large amounts of bitcoin will begin prioritizing investing in quantum computer nodes as a security measure. And/or it will become obvious to the bitcoin community that another soft fork update similar to segwit will be necessary. One way or another at this point the incentive to ensure the future of bitcoin is very strong. I think this will be solved just like the block size problem was solved with segwit. Back then when the problem was initially brought up there was strong resistance, but people quickly realized it was necessary and everybody got onboard after 2 notable major security conferences involving the most brilliant computer engineers in the world. it was then finally implemented.
 
Last edited:
The almost mandatory retest occurred today. S&P closed Breakout Monday at 5844, and closed today at 5844. Now the nail biting part, was last Monday a breakout or a fakeout? I'm on the side of breakout, but there are so many good reasons for either direction nothing will be too overly surprising.
 
The almost mandatory retest occurred today. S&P closed Breakout Monday at 5844, and closed today at 5844. Now the nail biting part, was last Monday a breakout or a fakeout? I'm on the side of breakout, but there are so many good reasons for either direction nothing will be too overly surprising.
And btc touched its ATH.
 
Heres something that should be making headline news in this thread and everywhere as far as im concerned. The fed held a bond auction and nobody showed up. So they bought 50 billion of their own bonds with printed ass funny money.


Yes, 2 thoughts.

First, this is exactly why I have an 80/20% gold/stock portfolio. In an infinitely inflating monetary environment, gold as close to a sure thing to retain value as anything. It won't grow in valuation, but it will grow to match any ever increasing money supply and will also swing the pendulum from undervalued to overvalued. Stock market can go to zero, I'll be standing just fine.

Bitcoin will not match gold in growth. Bitcoin will either vastly exceed the growth in gold's price or will vastly underperform compared to gold. I opted gold for the reliability, and also have a nice dose of Bitcoin options for the hopefully hyperaccelerated remainder of this year.
 
Heres something that should be making headline news in this thread and everywhere as far as im concerned. The fed held a bond auction and nobody showed up. So they bought 50 billion of their own bonds with printed ass funny money.


Secondly, after the breakout last Monday which caught me offguard, I've increased to 20% very aggressive tech. In a fiscally responsible environment one would have to be insane to invest in this market, and might still be. Valuations are very very high, and we're broke with no chance of ever paying off that debt in anything other than watered down money, if at all.

Blade Theory will always make it suicide to be a bear for anything longer than a few brief stealth spurts. The government will spend money it doesn't have, and the Fed will print money out of nothing to help foot the bill. Combined, that is always an extra jolt to the market in nominal terms as inflated money supply find their way into asset bubbles.

No, you aren't some kind of genius because you think the US has the best growth potential and investing in America always pays off. Not at all, you are simply the beneficiary of criminal irresponsibility that continues to steal from future generations and from the paycheck to paycheck masses that can't invest.

Offsetting the monetary inflation that isn't going away, ever, could well be the huge ai induced increase in productivity that could keep prices fairly stable. The ai boom is in its infancy and the increased productivity could somewhat justify the valuations, as well as spark a manic bubble in the coming years.
 
Last edited:
Secondly, after the breakout last Monday which caught me offguard, I've increased to 20% very aggressive tech. In a fiscally responsible environment one would have to be insane to invest in this market, and might still be. Valuations are very very high, and we're broke with no chance of ever paying off that debt in anything other than watered down money, if at all.

Blade Theory will always make it suicide to be a bear for anything longer than a few brief stealth spurts. The government will spend money it doesn't have, and the Fed will print money out of nothing to help foot the bill. Combined, that is always an extra jolt to the market in nominal terms as inflated money supply find their way into asset bubbles.

No, you aren't some kind of genius because you think the US has the best growth potential and investing in America always pays off. Not at all, you are simply the beneficiary of criminal irresponsibility that continues to steal from future generations and from the paycheck to paycheck masses that can't invest.

Offsetting the monetary inflation that isn't going away, ever, could well be the huge ai induced increase in productivity that could keep prices fairly stable. The ai boom is in its infancy and the increased productivity could somewhat justify the valuations, as well as spark a manic bubble in the coming years.
I agree with you, prices are insane but it doesn't mean we're not still going up...

2008 peak was 2300. Were 2.5x higher currently and for what? Has the economy actually improved that much?

And in 10 years time when s and p hits 10k they will still say prices are crazy but they will still print more money and still steal from the next generation.

Any politician that doesn't steal from the next generation just wont get elected.
 
The tax bill just passed in the house.

What is in it for the top 5%? Is it a give away only to the top 0.1%? Does anyone know?
 
The tax bill just passed in the house.

What is in it for the top 5%? Is it a give away only to the top 0.1%? Does anyone know?

Wharton projected significant tax benefits for those in the top three income quintiles but that was an earlier draft along with a decrease in after-tax income for the bottom two quintiles. Apparently there were "dozens of last-minute amendments to the more than 1,000 page bill in an effort to unite moderates and hardline conservatives behind the package".

I don't really expect the changes to be enough to overcome the Wharton/CBO's projected outcomes, but maybe further analysis will prove me wrong.

Earners in the 95-99% income group ($388k-988k) expected to benefit with additional $20k in after tax income on average.



Screenshot_20250522_090636_Reddit~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wharton projected significant tax benefits for those in the top three income quintiles but that was an earlier draft along with a decrease in after-tax income for the bottom two quintiles. Apparently there were "dozens of last-minute amendments to the more than 1,000 page bill in an effort to unite moderates and hardline conservatives behind the package".

I don't really expect the changes to be enough to overcome the Wharton/CBO's projected outcomes, but maybe further analysis will prove me wrong.

Earners in the 95-99% income group ($388k-988k) expected to benefit with additional $20k in after tax income on average.



View attachment 403988
That is nice for almost all of us if these figures have not changed that much. But the top 0.1% is laughing all the way to the bank.
 
They gotta pay for the golden dome somehow.
Thats not how. This is:


(Cant wait for all the libtards to call me a ****ing idiot and tell me how insane this is!) For the record I am not endorsing his newsletter. Just what hes explaining in the video. Jim Rickards is one of the most well informed men in the country.
 
Last edited:
Thats not how. This is:


(Cant wait for all the libtards to call me a ****ing idiot and tell me how insane this is!) For the record I am not endorsing his newsletter. Just what hes explaining in the video. Jim Rickards is one of the most well informed men in the country.

That was the dumbest thing I’ve ever read, and I spend most of my day on Reddit for comparison.
 
Yup! Here they come 😂 What? you dont think Jim Rickards has anything valid to say?
He may very well be correct about the value of our nation’s mineral resources, but why does he choose to sound like such a schill and be so slippery about what he really means? People who have sincere, accurate ideas and plans don’t usually resort to such hucksterism.
 
He may very well be correct about the value of our nation’s mineral resources, but why does he choose to sound like such a schill and be so slippery about what he really means? People who have sincere, accurate ideas and plans don’t usually resort to such hucksterism.
Well the man does run an investing newsletter. Like motley fool. Hes clearly trying to monetize what he knows that others dont. But to go so far as to immediately and totally dismiss what hes saying here is a bit foolish. Like I said, im not endorsing his newsletter. Only what hes saying about the forward thinking economic plan of the current asministration.

This man has been warning people about the debasement of the US dollar for decades as a proponent of gold investing. As an “insider” in Washington, he absolutely has a lot of valuable info about the goings on. Hes been pretty astoundingly accurate on many things in the past.
 
The more I learn and read this is the way to do it. What stops you from selling 20-30% close to top if your intention is to just buy more with it during the bear?
Well theres a risk of there not being a bear market. Like I was mentioning, many financial analysts are predicting that supply shock will hit at some point because of the scarcity and dwindling supply of BTC. Just recently the amount of BTC being bought up has exceeded the amount being mined, and the amounts available on exchanges have steadily been dropping as btc shifts from trading hands to HODL'ing hands. With nations and mega-companies buying large amounts weekly its inevitable. Only a matter of time.
 
The more I learn and read this is the way to do it. What stops you from selling 20-30% close to top if your intention is to just buy more with it during the bear?
This is how most people think (including newbie and experienced traders) and how almost everyone loses money or makes maybe 2 to 3% return when the markets making 30%.

No one can time the market and predict the top or bottom well enough to buy and sell @ the right time. So they end up selling low and buying high to recompense. Most of the gains made every couple of years are literally on about 2 to 3 days, so if you miss those you're toast...

Just like what happened with covid and just like what happened with tarifgate just 4 weeks ago...
 
This is how most people think (including newbie and experienced traders) and how almost everyone loses money or makes maybe 2 to 3% return when the markets making 30%.

No one can time the market and predict the top or bottom well enough to buy and sell @ the right time. So they end up selling low and buying high to recompense. Most of the gains made every couple of years are literally on about 2 to 3 days, so if you miss those you're toast...

Just like what happened with covid and just like what happened with tarifgate just 4 weeks ago...
Ok again, you cannot compare bitcoin (a commodity with a known halving schedule) to stocks (securities). BTC has a much more predictable pattern. But again, nothing is for certain. It certainly could break out.
 
Lol Trump posting about EU tariffs and threatening Apple with 25% tariffs. And people were starting to get hopeful.
Time to buy some apple stock or wait another day or so?

Probably be a week before he announces a "deal"
 
Also there are people who are only on the bitcoin standard. Meaning even there bank accounts are only in btc with minimal fiat for maybe 1 month of bills. I am guessing if one were to do this it would need to start in the bear market otherwise assuming one did it now and bought at 110-130 (converting their checking/savings but with the intent to actively use it) only to see it drop to close to 70 k maybe in 2026 even though long term they would be ok the short term pain would be rough?
For wealthy people with a diversified portfolio, or people with strong incomes, they could get away with something like that. For the average Joe, I would not recommend that at present. Its still risky for the near term. Im a HODL'er So I generally buy more in the bear market and taper off as it nears the cycle top, and perhaps switch to selling my trading portfolio at the top. Which is about 10% of my holdings. That money goes into a money market fund or HYSA, and then back into bitcoin during the bear market.
 
Thats not how. This is:


(Cant wait for all the libtards to call me a ****ing idiot and tell me how insane this is!) For the record I am not endorsing his newsletter. Just what hes explaining in the video. Jim Rickards is one of the most well informed men in the country.
We already have a 150 trillion dollar trust fund. It's called the Fed. They could print off 150 trillion tomorrow and crash the dollar the same way this 150 trillion of hidden cash would.

I'm giving this story a believability rating of "Bigfoot."
 
We already have a 150 trillion dollar trust fund. It's called the Fed. They could print off 150 trillion tomorrow and crash the dollar the same way this 150 trillion of hidden cash would.

I'm giving this story a believability rating of "Bigfoot."
Im not understanding you. You’re saying printing $150 trillion is the same as unlocking a $150 trillion natural resources market thats just been sitting there under legal protections?

You do realize some of the legislation has already been signed into effect right? As far as the minerals go. And the rest is in the works.
 
Last edited:
Im not understanding you. You’re saying printing $150 trillion is the same as unlocking a $150 trillion natural resources market thats just been sitting there under legal protections?

You do realize some of the legislation has already been signed into effect right? As far as the minerals go. And the rest is in the works.
Ok, 150 trillion of resources is definitely different. I started to listen but realized it was a very long video and stopped. I thought it was a 150 trillion dollar hidden trust fund of money.
 
Ok, 150 trillion of resources is definitely different. I started to listen but realized it was a very long video and stopped. I thought it was a 150 trillion dollar hidden trust fund of money.

It’s presented in a sleazy late night tv advertisement or crappy newsletter format, which makes it hard to follow (needs willpower to keep reading through the misleading terms like “trust fund”) but the gist is that there are mineral deposits on public lands that can be estimated in the trillions. Like everything, it’s not as simple and clear cut as it is presented. One example that he used is the Pebble Mine in southwest AK, which is located on fishing habitat, which is why there was opposition to development since it would negatively disrupt an existing industry.
 
Well the man does run an investing newsletter. Like motley fool. Hes clearly trying to monetize what he knows that others dont. But to go so far as to immediately and totally dismiss what hes saying here is a bit foolish. Like I said, im not endorsing his newsletter. Only what hes saying about the forward thinking economic plan of the current asministration.

This man has been warning people about the debasement of the US dollar for decades as a proponent of gold investing. As an “insider” in Washington, he absolutely has a lot of valuable info about the goings on. Hes been pretty astoundingly accurate on many things in the past.
Lol..

That was the most worthless articles I have ever read. It's one of those things that my pop up blocker would usually screen or I would expect to see on a 2am infomercial.

Please tell me you paid the $49 to find out the secrets. Maybe even post them so we can all get rich!!

Holy smokes
 
Lol..

That was the most worthless articles I have ever read. It's one of those things that my pop up blocker would usually screen or I would expect to see on a 2am infomercial.

Please tell me you paid the $49 to find out the secrets. Maybe even post them so we can all get rich!!

Holy smokes
Of course not. I disagree though. He makes some valid points. Opening up mineral mining out west is a big deal.
 
Of course not. I disagree though. He makes some valid points. Opening up mineral mining out west is a big deal.
So what is he actually asking the viewer to do,Invest in his scheme (I couldn’t watch it until the end)? Why not just put money in one of the many mining based mutual funds and ETFs out there?
 
So what is he actually asking the viewer to do,Invest in his scheme (I couldn’t watch it until the end)? Why not just put money in one of the many mining based mutual funds and ETFs out there?
Basically, you pay $49 and he sends you his book of secret investments based on the idea that the US government will/should allow vast swathes of public land to be strip mined.

Those companies would, in reality, decimate the environment, and provide minimal benefit to the public, and do nothing for the US economy.

Its all a pipe dream
 
So what is he actually asking the viewer to do,Invest in his scheme (I couldn’t watch it until the end)? Why not just put money in one of the many mining based mutual funds and ETFs out there?
No he runs an investing newsletter similar to motley fool. Its basically investing advise. As in which specific ones to invest in. Thats all. Subject to the same risks as any investing advice.
 
Basically, you pay $49 and he sends you his book of secret investments based on the idea that the US government will/should allow vast swathes of public land to be strip mined.

Those companies would, in reality, decimate the environment, and provide minimal benefit to the public, and do nothing for the US economy.

Its all a pipe dream
Whats a pipe dream is the libtard environmentalist agenda. We dont have the resources and we’re going bankrupt. Open your eyes.
 
Top