IlianaSedai said:
I don't agree that "the MAIN difference between a pharmacist and a doctor is that the pharmacist can't prescribe."
I disagree. I think that's the primary difference between a clinical pharmacist and an internal medicine physician. Another major difference is that, while an internal medicine doctor will follow a patient as both an inpatient and in the clinic, a clinical pharmacist will usually only see them in one or the other setting. And even with liberal prescribing-under-protocol privileges, the pharmacist is not the patient's primary care provider.
MEDICINE: Understand the disease process, prognosis, and treatment rationale.
PHARMACY: Understand pharmacologic treatment, mechanisms, delivery methods, half-life, etc.
Not true. A clinical pharmacist needs to know both of these, and so does an internal medicine physician. Each may know their respective body of knowledge better than the other, but they both have to have a solid understanding of all of it.
MEDICINE: Long(er) term relationships with patients in certain specialties.
PHARMACY: Short term or minimal relationships with many patients.
Yeah. Although in retail you can get to know some people pretty well if you're not working in an insanely busy pharmacy. It's one of the reasons I like retail.
MEDICINE: Ultimate responsibility for diagnosis, treatment & coordination of care in certain specialties.
PHARMACY: Usually a clinical consultant in the hospital, but patients do come to you for help, especially outside the hospital.
This is also pretty much on target.
MEDICINE: You usually need to SEE the patient to do most of your job.
PHARMACY: You might need to, but oftentimes you don't. It's worth getting a history though -- for example, you want to know what the patient has before suggesting the right antibiotic for good bacterial coverage or to avoid allergic cross-reactions.
Heh heh heh. This is completely true. I used to get so annoyed with my pharmacy preceptors for insisting that I go interview the patient. It's like doing lab tests if you're a doctor--if it's not going to change your assessment or plan, it's a waste of resources (in this case, your time). whereas, in medicine, the patient's symptoms are what drive a lot of your clinical decisions. So I never feel like it's a waste of time now.
This is probably not nearly enough information to make a decision. The only other thing I would suggest is spending a day shadowing both pharmacists and physicians. Their jobs are very different, and you probably need to see it to understand.
In particular, if you want to compare and contrast their roles, it would be useful to find an internal medicine team with a clinical pharmacist, and spend a day or two following the physicians, and then a day or two following the pharmacist. And keep your eyes open regarding the team dynamics, as well. You'll figure it out pretty quickly.
Really, the bottom line is you can do small pieces of an internal medicine physician's job in various settings as a pharmacist, but in that profession, there is no single practice setting where you can do all of it.