I thought that I would share an experience I had with being honest about my weaknesses. When I first applied in 1994, I had to interview with someone on the pre-med committee so that he could write me a composite committee letter based on the interview and my other letters of recommendation. I did not know the interviewer that well, but I did have him as a professor for two semesters of organic chemistry. I got As both semesters but I never really spoke to the professor. Anyway, at the interview he asks me what my greatest weakness was. I felt that giving the standard "I'm a perfectionist" "I'm a workaholic" "I sometimes take on too much work" etc. was total b.s. So I decided to be honest rather than give some b.s. answer and I said my biggest weakness was that I am a slow reader. I still feel that I read very slowly, and at the time I felt that it was the reason that I didn't score as well as I wanted on the MCAT (I could not finish any of the sections in 1994). Anyway, later when I was interviewing at medical schools, one of my interviewers said, "well, professor X says in your committee letter that you're a slow reader, how do you expect to cope with all the material you'll have to read in medical school and do well on the boards?" I was stunned that the committee letter writer included my weakness in the letter. I always assumed that the committee always serves as your advocate (another lesson from this experience, don't assume that the committee is always acting in your best interest even if you don't know them that well -- get to know the members of the committee if possible). As many of you know, I did not get in to any medical schools that year. I have suspicions that the committee letter was weak in several areas. I don't really know why the professor who wrote it would write a weak letter, but I think because he didn't know me he was basing a lot on my interview (I know my other letters were strong because the writers sent me curtesy copies). And I think at the time I was not very good at interviews for several reasons. But one problem might be that I was unwilling to "play the game" and give the same b.s. answers to questions like "what is your biggest weakness." I personally admire someone who gives an honest answer to that question, but if you do give an honest answer I wonder if some interviewers get the impression that you don't care that much. They might think, "if this guy is not willing to play the game, he must not care that much about getting in." So now I always give more of a b.s. answer. I usually say something like, "I used to have problems staying organized, but then when I worked as a prosecutor and was carrying 170 cases at a time and I had to be ready to go trial on any one of them, I had to cure this problem, and now my organizational skills are quite a bit stronger." It doesn't really answer the question. I tell them what used to be a weakness, but isn't a weakness now. I've never had someone follow up with "hey you didn't answer my question." They usually move on. The bottom line: it's a b.s. question deserving of a b.s. answer.