thirdunity said:
Question,
1) Is CNA a good job for a premed student?
2) Can it be done part-time?
I need a job while in school and it may as well be something that will get me clinical experience. One question is, is length of training. I don't want to take another year or more off from school to do the training. I know some will say "school is my job" but I'm having to go it on my own, I'm about to leave the husband.
I *had* a career prior to going back to school, but the work I'm trained for, generally can't be done part-time, and required too many hours, so that I wouldn't have time to do volunteering to get my clinical experience let alone even take one class.
I was an EMT for 2 years and then a CNA for 18 months before med school (latter offered a more flexible schedule around school, though less money). I agree that being an EMT will most likely give you better clinical exposure, but I wouldn't necessarily discount CNA too far, nor hype the utility of the EMT clinical experience while applying to med school. Depending on where you apply, and who individually interviews you, having been a CNA might be more of advantage. See if the following story makes sense, it is true:
At a premed talk I attended (a few years ago) given by a dean of admissions of a medical school, the dean told a story (which itself may not be true). In replying to a question on "what type of clinical experience are you looking for" he gave the following reply, closely paraphrased: "Well, in a recent set of interviews I had two applicants explaining their experiences, each as an aide in a hospital. One said, 'all I got to do was bring pillows and blankets to patients,' while the other said 'I got to bring pillows and blankets to patients.' Hopefully his point translates here.
CNA work is much less glamorous, often lower paid (as it is relatively unskilled), and is often thankless. This being said, if I were interviewing a medical student who had done CNA work for any great length of time, I might give said applicant higher consideration than a former EMT hellbent on explaining the glory days to me. Trust me, once in clinicals (3&4 year of med school), the same people who would never feed/transfer/wash a patient are often the classmates that no one likes. They turn into the docs that nurses hate...wonder why.
A LOT of medicine, both in preclinical studies and in particular on the floors (in medical school and practice) is non-glamorous work that, to be done with excellence, requires commitment and dilligence. Anyone who has slaved through long CNA (or nursing) shifts for any length of time has demonstrated something to me regarding commitment to patient care...a subject given A LOT of attention by the medical training community (i.e. including the people who interview you for medical school).
In short, I'd say that if CNA is easy for you to do and EMT would require considerable short-term sacrifices, I wouldn't worry that you'll look "less admittable" come application time if you choose the CNA route. Adcomms aren't looking for someone who knows how to run a code; they know you'll learn that someday. They DO want someone with a DEEP commitment to medicine which, without even bring up EMT work, can be demonstrated through work as a volunteer/aide/CNA.