Uh, that was my point. We have FAR MORE than a mid-level level of training, so I think it's ok to act like one so long as we continue CME and have a reasonable access to supervision.
How much our training exceeds NPs/PAs isn't as relevant as folks make it. Because most of our training occurs at the medical school level and involves things we wouldn't even
consider doing as a psychiatrist. I did a bunch of rotations in trauma surgery, pediatrics, pathology, and a bunch of classes in histology and biochemistry, but you won't see me using any of that on the floor or in the clinic. Assuming folks aren't going full cowboy and starting central lines or diagnosing and managing severe heart disease on their unit, the stuff we manage is going to be very similar to the stuff NPs and PAs are qualified to manage. The difference is that a few years out of residency and they'll be doing it a lot more and they will be attending the same CME as us to stay current. What will be 10% of our job will be 100% of theirs.
I'm not an internist and don't behave like one, but I'm also not scared to do something if (for instance) a patient doesn't have a PCP for INTERIM care, or to add a 2nd hypertensive if I can't convince my pt to GO to their PCP (which happened all the time at the CMHC I trained at), or order appropriate tests so the speialist I referred to actually has something to look at. At the safety net hospital I worked at, due to the way state grants worked, it wasn't unheard of to qualify for free psych visits, free labs, free meds (I mean "free"), but NOT qualify for PCP visits. So I was just supposed to ignore the COPD, appropriate need for pneumovax, TSH in the 5s, or mild DM2? That's a good way to get my butt sued for negligence. If I were a defense lawyer I'd be all over it.
Oh, no. You are
MUCH less likely to be sued for doing your job than you are to be sued for doing someone's for which you lack qualifications.
If you taking on management of COPD and your patient croaks, ANY lawyer's eyes will light up when they find out the treating physician was a psychiatrist. At this point, you can explain that you weren't "scared" and that you had to act as PCP because you couldn't "convince my patient to go to their PCP." You can also explain how you did half an intern year of internal medicine in lieu of the three years that is considered the standard. Well, maybe four months of IM, if you take out neurology. And yes, this all occured before you even had your medical license. This is how you will get your butt sued.
I primarily work in PES or inpatient units and do a lot more physical medicine than most psychiatrists as part of my Army Service. I have plenty of opportunity to read EKGs, run labs, and evaluate charts. I also continue and even tweak medication regimens (though I minimize this as most outpatient docs appreciate that about as much as we do when a PCP changes our psych med regimen). I am fine managing algorithmic med decisions (DM, etc.), though I chart like hell.
But when you start stepping into the actual role of PCP, managing physical medical care longitudinally for a patient, you are operating outside your scope of practice and opening yourself up to legal hurt. Comparing hours and rotations between psychiatrists and NPs/PAs isn't all that helpful, because the difference is that managing these things is their job and not ours.