- Joined
- Nov 4, 2015
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 6
Hello guys,
I am experiencing a problem in my Organic Chemistry I Lab. I have two other partners in my lab group, one being very prepared and the other partner being lackadaisical and unprepared. For our third lab, we had to analyze analgesics and an unknown sample using TLC and isolate β-carotene from spinach leaves using column chromatography. Because the two objectives were unrelated, the TA asked for the work to be divided. I decided to execute the analgesics TLC experiment. I successfully carried out the lab by receiving reasonable Rf values for the compounds based on their polarity. However, the unprepared partner in my group decided to do the isolation of β-carotene. I didn't think much of letting him complete this task on his own because I assumed this was an independent project by the way my TA divided the work. When I completed my project, I noticed he was still working on his, so I decided to help him. However, the isolation of β-carotene was unsuccessful due to an error in the beginning steps of the process. I was not associated with this whatsoever since I was carrying out the TLC experiment.
Yesterday, I received my results grade from Lab 3 and I received a 7/10, knocking my grade down to a B. Curious as to how I could improve this, I emailed my TA and asked why I received a 7/10 for my results. The syllabus is obscure and does not elaborate on the grading protocol used to determine the grade of the results. My TA replied to me and told me that the grade was calculated based on having consistent Rf values and correct identification of the unknown substance and how accurate the crude and purified β-carotene was compared to the standard β-carotene. I received full points for the first part since I successfully demonstrated my knowledge in TLC. However, I only received 2/5 points for part two since the two experimental compounds did not match the standard whatsoever.
After that reply, I expressed to my TA my unfavorable opinion towards my lab partner's work ethic. In a nice and respectful manner, I asked my TA if there was any way we could work around this since I am not responsible for my lab partner's work ethic. The TA told me that he has little sympathy for me whatsoever since I complete the "easiest" parts of the experiment. I found this a bit weird because all lab partners should be intellectually stimulated despite their commitment to the class. He told me that I need to do the more cumbersome parts of the lab since I would not be able to depend on my lab partner. In a nutshell, my TA is telling me that I need to take control and watch over my lab partner. As I previously stated, every member of the lab should be prepared to execute their designated part of the lab even if the material is arduous.
Upset with this response, I have been asking my friends how the results are being graded in their classes. Their TA's grade their results based on completeness; the whole group is not penalized if somebody is clueless as to what is going on. The syllabus does not state whether the results will be graded on accuracy or completeness or both.
In addition to this, my TA often yells and belittles his students. He hasn't done this to me, but he has done it to my lab partner (the unprepared one). He will use discouraging language (i.e. "stupid")that causes students to be scared of him. Also, he is impatient. Whenever a lab takes a long time, he will become frustrated and refuse to help students. This is potentially dangerous as undergraduates are working with new and foreign organic chemicals.
Is my next step to contact the lab coordinator? How should I present my situation to the lab coordinator? Should I bring my other lab partner (prepared one) with me to talk to the lab coordinator?
I apologize if this post is wordy. It's my first time posting on SDN. Thank you for your help.
I am experiencing a problem in my Organic Chemistry I Lab. I have two other partners in my lab group, one being very prepared and the other partner being lackadaisical and unprepared. For our third lab, we had to analyze analgesics and an unknown sample using TLC and isolate β-carotene from spinach leaves using column chromatography. Because the two objectives were unrelated, the TA asked for the work to be divided. I decided to execute the analgesics TLC experiment. I successfully carried out the lab by receiving reasonable Rf values for the compounds based on their polarity. However, the unprepared partner in my group decided to do the isolation of β-carotene. I didn't think much of letting him complete this task on his own because I assumed this was an independent project by the way my TA divided the work. When I completed my project, I noticed he was still working on his, so I decided to help him. However, the isolation of β-carotene was unsuccessful due to an error in the beginning steps of the process. I was not associated with this whatsoever since I was carrying out the TLC experiment.
Yesterday, I received my results grade from Lab 3 and I received a 7/10, knocking my grade down to a B. Curious as to how I could improve this, I emailed my TA and asked why I received a 7/10 for my results. The syllabus is obscure and does not elaborate on the grading protocol used to determine the grade of the results. My TA replied to me and told me that the grade was calculated based on having consistent Rf values and correct identification of the unknown substance and how accurate the crude and purified β-carotene was compared to the standard β-carotene. I received full points for the first part since I successfully demonstrated my knowledge in TLC. However, I only received 2/5 points for part two since the two experimental compounds did not match the standard whatsoever.
After that reply, I expressed to my TA my unfavorable opinion towards my lab partner's work ethic. In a nice and respectful manner, I asked my TA if there was any way we could work around this since I am not responsible for my lab partner's work ethic. The TA told me that he has little sympathy for me whatsoever since I complete the "easiest" parts of the experiment. I found this a bit weird because all lab partners should be intellectually stimulated despite their commitment to the class. He told me that I need to do the more cumbersome parts of the lab since I would not be able to depend on my lab partner. In a nutshell, my TA is telling me that I need to take control and watch over my lab partner. As I previously stated, every member of the lab should be prepared to execute their designated part of the lab even if the material is arduous.
Upset with this response, I have been asking my friends how the results are being graded in their classes. Their TA's grade their results based on completeness; the whole group is not penalized if somebody is clueless as to what is going on. The syllabus does not state whether the results will be graded on accuracy or completeness or both.
In addition to this, my TA often yells and belittles his students. He hasn't done this to me, but he has done it to my lab partner (the unprepared one). He will use discouraging language (i.e. "stupid")that causes students to be scared of him. Also, he is impatient. Whenever a lab takes a long time, he will become frustrated and refuse to help students. This is potentially dangerous as undergraduates are working with new and foreign organic chemicals.
Is my next step to contact the lab coordinator? How should I present my situation to the lab coordinator? Should I bring my other lab partner (prepared one) with me to talk to the lab coordinator?
I apologize if this post is wordy. It's my first time posting on SDN. Thank you for your help.