is there any benefit of doing very well in preclinical classes?

Feb 11, 2014
82
52
Status
Pre-Medical
I go to a true P/F school, no internal ranking, pre-clinical grades are not used for AOA, etc. People say that doing well first 2 years will help when step 1 comes but is it really the case? The stuff I learned a week ago, I have already forgotten so I'm pretty sure I'd have to relearn most of the board material brand new. Also, I heard first year courses are rarely tested on the boards.
 
Mar 26, 2013
501
499
Status
Medical Student
The better you know it the first time, the faster and better it will come back to you when you do your boards review.
 

EMDO2018

Membership Revoked
Removed
Oct 8, 2013
1,913
1,232
I don't know
Status
Medical Student
I go to a true P/F school, no internal ranking, pre-clinical grades are not used for AOA, etc. People say that doing well first 2 years will help when step 1 comes but is it really the case? The stuff I learned a week ago, I have already forgotten so I'm pretty sure I'd have to relearn most of the board material brand new. Also, I heard first year courses are rarely tested on the boards.

not really, why are you posting this in pre allo?
 
Mar 9, 2014
617
750
Status
Medical Student
I go to a true P/F school, no internal ranking, pre-clinical grades are not used for AOA, etc. People say that doing well first 2 years will help when step 1 comes but is it really the case? The stuff I learned a week ago, I have already forgotten so I'm pretty sure I'd have to relearn most of the board material brand new. Also, I heard first year courses are rarely tested on the boards.
You'd be surprised what comes back to you once you see some boards-type questions. You will have to work much harder at boards prep if you only do the bare minimum during first year. These courses aren't rarely tested, you'll have plenty of questions on them.
 

DermViser

10+ Year Member
Apr 4, 2009
17,559
12,907
Status
Resident [Any Field]
I go to a true P/F school, no internal ranking, pre-clinical grades are not used for AOA, etc. People say that doing well first 2 years will help when step 1 comes but is it really the case? The stuff I learned a week ago, I have already forgotten so I'm pretty sure I'd have to relearn most of the board material brand new. Also, I heard first year courses are rarely tested on the boards.
Yes, doing well in the first 2 years is an integral step to doing well on the boards. That's so the 6-8 weeks of studying after MS-2 is over is more a review than a learning stuff for the first time. So no, they weren't lying to you.

And no, first year courses are tested on boards. Maybe not as nitty-gritty as course exams, but they are tested. Take advantage of your "true" P/F curriculum in the first 2 years to maximize your learning and your board scores while not having to be anal about every single point on course exams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaNicole and lmn

redpanda

Fellow-lol
7+ Year Member
Oct 6, 2009
606
501
Status
Fellow [Any Field]
The better you know it the first time, the faster and better it will come back to you when you do your boards review.
This and the fact that the better your preclinical knowledge foundation, the easier it is to load clerkship knowledge on top of it. Because clearly, no one learns all the stuff on the IM shelf exam in the 8-12 weeks of the clerkship. It certainly helps to have some pre-existing pattern recognition.
 

Snoopy2006

10+ Year Member
Jun 22, 2009
359
572
Status
Resident [Any Field]
Echo the above. You'll regret not getting a topic down well the first time when you're trying to get two years of material reviewed in 6 weeks. Take a look at some of the popular Step 1 study schedules out there. You think it's hard to review an entire subject in 2-3 days? Try learning it all new - not gonna happen.