calbears84

professional baller
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Sep 16, 2001
323
1
41
berkeley, ca
Visit site
Status (Visible)
jefferson wants LOR from a bio, physics and a chem prof. i can't get a LOR from my physics professors...so im planning to write them a letter explaining why? is anyone else writing to them? what did you say in your letter?
 

Femtochemistry

Skunk Works
15+ Year Member
May 13, 2002
663
21
www.google.com
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
I think you are mistaken: they only want one from your bio, chem, humanities and physics prof if you don?t have a premed committee to write a composite for you.
And even if you don't have the premed committe, it says "if possible."

Check it out here, look on page 19 under "application procedure"


hope this helps; if you are still unsure, give them a call at (215) 955-6983.
 
About the Ads

Adcadet

Long way from Gate 27
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 22, 2002
2,155
13
44 deg 1 min 11 sec N, 92 deg 28 min 55 sec W
Visit site
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
I'm going to send in a three sentence letter telling them three things:
1. The insinuation that they know who should write for me better than I do is simply insulting and stupid; my letter writters are much better
2. They can go &*%$ themselves if they don't like that.
and
3. If they have any questions, they can ask during an interview.

OK, maybe that's my fantasy letter. My real one will prolly be pretty short and just explain that my three writers can give the best impression of me, considering that I'm a grad student and have been done with college coursework for ~1.5 years. I'll be surprized if I have any problem.
 
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
About the Ads