- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 1
I am sorry for posting this question here again and again... but I am a non-traditional student...
I have been out of school for about 5 years and need a solid review for the science material (doing a post-bac is not an option). I am currently taking Kaplan's Science Edge for MCAT review, which I think covers ok the specific science concepts needed on the MCAT. I also have my textbooks from before ('06).
I think I need a class because I need structure. I would prefer great teachers, but if the books are good, I can study on my own. I've read many threats on the MCAT forum about various schedules and what works for whom. Based on my conclusion, I would probably benefit from the structure of the class (I'm just being realistic here), plus I work full time and decreasing to part time isn't an option at the moment. I plan on taking the MCAT in May of 2010 to apply next year.
I am debating between Kaplan and TPR (The Princeton Review) and I am wondering if any of you who are nontraditional students had taken either one. I'm also planning on purchasing the Berkeley Review books since I heard they are the best at material review. I've read different rumors about Kaplan's books not being thorough enough, bad rep about their verbal passages being different from AAMC by quite a bit giving people false reassurance and etc. I've also read that TPR books are more detailed than I need, but people understand the concepts better. TPR also has longer classes than Kaplan and slightly less (by 4) practice tests that are written by the company (both give you access to the 8 AAMC tests). I also read that Kaplan has subject tests and "topical" tests allowing you to test yourself on a weaker area, where as TPR does not. I also read that TPR has much better teachers than Kaplan. So I guess it's a horse-a-piece.
I am someone who studies on my own, but need a program so I know how to pace myself. But I also need a good review. So I'm looking for feedback from people who've either taken either one or taught for either one or just what you think about the two. I would appreciate it if you told me what you like and what you didn't - rather than "this sucks" or "it's great."
Thanks - your feedback is much appreciated.
I have been out of school for about 5 years and need a solid review for the science material (doing a post-bac is not an option). I am currently taking Kaplan's Science Edge for MCAT review, which I think covers ok the specific science concepts needed on the MCAT. I also have my textbooks from before ('06).
I think I need a class because I need structure. I would prefer great teachers, but if the books are good, I can study on my own. I've read many threats on the MCAT forum about various schedules and what works for whom. Based on my conclusion, I would probably benefit from the structure of the class (I'm just being realistic here), plus I work full time and decreasing to part time isn't an option at the moment. I plan on taking the MCAT in May of 2010 to apply next year.
I am debating between Kaplan and TPR (The Princeton Review) and I am wondering if any of you who are nontraditional students had taken either one. I'm also planning on purchasing the Berkeley Review books since I heard they are the best at material review. I've read different rumors about Kaplan's books not being thorough enough, bad rep about their verbal passages being different from AAMC by quite a bit giving people false reassurance and etc. I've also read that TPR books are more detailed than I need, but people understand the concepts better. TPR also has longer classes than Kaplan and slightly less (by 4) practice tests that are written by the company (both give you access to the 8 AAMC tests). I also read that Kaplan has subject tests and "topical" tests allowing you to test yourself on a weaker area, where as TPR does not. I also read that TPR has much better teachers than Kaplan. So I guess it's a horse-a-piece.
I am someone who studies on my own, but need a program so I know how to pace myself. But I also need a good review. So I'm looking for feedback from people who've either taken either one or taught for either one or just what you think about the two. I would appreciate it if you told me what you like and what you didn't - rather than "this sucks" or "it's great."
Thanks - your feedback is much appreciated.