- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Messages
- 276
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Dental
Just to get the full picture of where I really stand....I took the DAT last year in December w/ lame results. I ranked in the 52% overall (AA=17,TS=16,PA=17.....Figured that I could do it on natural ability......I studied for 3 days). Obviously, I didn't get in but did manage an interveiw at my school of choice, UT Memphis. I have an overall GPA of 3.23 and a science GPA of 3.13. The lowest score I made in undergrad was a D in OChem1.....got an A the second time around. I graduated in May w/ a B.A. in Psychology (big mistake looking back...wish I had stuck to science). With my stats in mind you can see why I need to make at least a solid 20. My application is already at Memphis and since I have already interveiwed they told me that I could be considered before the December 1st acceptance deadline.
I am scheduled to take the DAT for the second time on Nov. 15. I have been focusing on science exclusively. I used Kaplan online as a systematic study schedule w/ schuam's books and my old text books for supplement. Also I have just started my ACEtheDAT regiment. I expected to perform a lot better then I actually did on these tests. Take a look and let me hear your predictions......also is AcetheDAT gonna be the best material for PAT reveiw or do I need my girlfriend to bust out the protracter w/straight edge and make me some tiny angles.
Kaplan Final......
AA=18.2
TS=17.7
Bio=21
GChem=14 (the test malfunctioned on several questions....no graphs or tables shown that were required for questions)
OChem=17
RC=19
QR=18
PA=23 (worthless)
Kaplan Practice DAT.......
AA=20.0
TS=17.0
Bio=17 (I know that Kaplan isn't enough to prepare me for Bio but does that mean that this score isn't realistic b/c they ask me questions that weren't covered by the course.....maybe they do that to make it more realist??????Besides, I made a 16 on the Bio section on the real DAT last year w/out ever having learned human anatomy at all b/c I never took those classes.)
GChem=17
OChem=17
RC=22
QR=21
PA=22 (even more worthless)
Let me know where you think I stand......I am scared as hell after reading the forums on hear.......Some people say the the real DAT is a lot easier for chemistry but the others that I have read said that they did the same and even worse. The AA means nothing to me because the PAT averages into that 20.0 and I know from experience how much harder the real PAT is going to be. Honestly....I feel that this is pretty bad considering how long I have been studying for(almost three months), guess I'll try to mix practice tests with content reveiw for the rest of the week.
By the way....for those of you who have taken the real DAT and Kaplan's, I would love it if you could post the results together in a comparison. Also....I really need to know the difference in scores for Biology. If it isn't going to increase than I may be in trouble. If you have an opinion than post it.....reasurement and criticism are both potent motivating factors for me.
Thanks for atleast reading
I noticed that this forum is getting more traffic than the DAT specific one....figured I could reach more test veterans on this one. 👍
I am scheduled to take the DAT for the second time on Nov. 15. I have been focusing on science exclusively. I used Kaplan online as a systematic study schedule w/ schuam's books and my old text books for supplement. Also I have just started my ACEtheDAT regiment. I expected to perform a lot better then I actually did on these tests. Take a look and let me hear your predictions......also is AcetheDAT gonna be the best material for PAT reveiw or do I need my girlfriend to bust out the protracter w/straight edge and make me some tiny angles.
Kaplan Final......
AA=18.2
TS=17.7
Bio=21
GChem=14 (the test malfunctioned on several questions....no graphs or tables shown that were required for questions)
OChem=17
RC=19
QR=18
PA=23 (worthless)
Kaplan Practice DAT.......
AA=20.0
TS=17.0
Bio=17 (I know that Kaplan isn't enough to prepare me for Bio but does that mean that this score isn't realistic b/c they ask me questions that weren't covered by the course.....maybe they do that to make it more realist??????Besides, I made a 16 on the Bio section on the real DAT last year w/out ever having learned human anatomy at all b/c I never took those classes.)
GChem=17
OChem=17
RC=22
QR=21
PA=22 (even more worthless)
Let me know where you think I stand......I am scared as hell after reading the forums on hear.......Some people say the the real DAT is a lot easier for chemistry but the others that I have read said that they did the same and even worse. The AA means nothing to me because the PAT averages into that 20.0 and I know from experience how much harder the real PAT is going to be. Honestly....I feel that this is pretty bad considering how long I have been studying for(almost three months), guess I'll try to mix practice tests with content reveiw for the rest of the week.
By the way....for those of you who have taken the real DAT and Kaplan's, I would love it if you could post the results together in a comparison. Also....I really need to know the difference in scores for Biology. If it isn't going to increase than I may be in trouble. If you have an opinion than post it.....reasurement and criticism are both potent motivating factors for me.
Thanks for atleast reading
I noticed that this forum is getting more traffic than the DAT specific one....figured I could reach more test veterans on this one. 👍
