- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 125
- Reaction score
- 0
Flopotomist said:Well, I don't think that as future physicians we should encourage people that clearly can't handle the workload into searching for loopholes that will enable them to become an MD when they just don't have what it takes. We are not talking about a banker that may screw up some paperwork, this is human lives that are potentially at stake.
Further, the OP is already no doubt in considerable debt - why encourage him to add to this debt by hiring a lawyer? Plus, if he wins, he may have to take out even more loans, and ultimately be unable to pass his boards.
Why are you so judgemental? My school actually has a 5 year program for some students- I don't know exactly what the criteria is to be put on that track, but basically some students spread traditional first year courses over two years. I would never presume that the 5 year students "don't have what it takes" to be good physicians because they "can't handle" the same pace as the rest of us. Nor do I think these spots should be given to people that can complete the program in 4 years. My school obviously selected these students for reasons that were not based soley on academics, and I appreciate the diversity. BTW, the 5 yr students do pass the boards. In addition, at my school you have to pass 50% of the exams and receive a 70 as your final grade to pass a course. Think of it this way: you can fail 50% of the tests in med school and still become a doctor. It is the school's right to dimiss the poster, and *hopefully* the academic review process was fair- but you are certainly not in a position in life to judge whether or not he has "what it takes" to become a good physician based on the information in these posts.