- Joined
- Jul 30, 2003
- Messages
- 1,721
- Reaction score
- 1
lately i've been thinking about the impact of having a late interview. of course, we all know the stories of people interviewing late at rolling admissions schools who are just "interviewing for waitlist spots", but what about the non-rolling schools? technically, you wouldn't be interviewing for a waitlist spot, as they haven't necessarily accepted anyone yet (for instance; a feb interview when 'school x' doesn't issue decisions until mid-march), but do you think they kind of 'earmark' certain applicants who interviewed earlier for an accptance, and with that in mind, accept fewer of the late interviewees? i mean, realistically, if a school really wanted an applicant, they would have interviewed him/her in october, rather than jan/feb/march, right? does this make any difference?
also, if anyone has any success stories about late interviews at non-rolling schools that led to outright acceptances, feel free to post them!
thanks, all,
sd
also, if anyone has any success stories about late interviews at non-rolling schools that led to outright acceptances, feel free to post them!
thanks, all,
sd