What letters from whom do most schools want?

1 doctor
2 professors (1 science, 1 other)
1 extracurric
Last edited by a moderator:
About the Ads
May 24, 2009
Status (Visible)
  1. Pre-Optometry
I would try to see if your school has a health professions committee (HPC)....If they do then i would deff get a letter from them versus any academic professor. Also have your professor write a letter to the HPC so that also gets added on to it.

For me i only had 3...1. HPC letter, 1 Optometrist, 1 research professor....that i did research with for over 2 yrs with
May 26, 2011
Status (Visible)
  1. Pre-Optometry
Had to bump this thread because i had questions about LOR for optometry school.

Little background:

I graduated last year (undergrad - BS biology ~3.1 gpa, no OAT yet) and didnt get any letter of rec's from professors (fail :( ). i will only have 2 letters from different ODs that know me pretty well since i worked at their offices for about a year. Planning to get a third from either a clergy or a strong one from a pharmacist (employer) at a private pharmacy i previously volunteered at. I noticed that many schools require at least 1 science/math prof. I'm planning to apply this upcoming cycle for 2012 fall.

Couple questions:

1. Should i even get a 3rd from one of the 2 options that i mentioned? would a letter of rec from a pharmacist be perceived as lack of dedication for optometry? even though it states clearly from an employer point of view rather than a prospective pharmacist

2. Should i even apply to schools that specifically require a math/science prof recommendation? would i be turned down instantly because I'm missing one from a math/science prof or if i don't have enough LORs?

3. how important are letter of rec's for admission? anyone got any opinions or heard anything from optometry schools?

Thanks everyone! :)
About the Ads
This thread is more than 10 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.