weirdo700

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Sep 12, 2002
90
0
Visit site
Status (Visible)
Hi I have been out of school since June of 2001 and I only have academic letters of recommendation that are dated from June of 2001 to September of 2001. When I submitted my app to Baylor I noticed that they require all letters be written within a year. I do have letters from my employer but I also notice they require two academic letters. Does anyone have any suggestions? I would hate to have to return my letters to my profs a year later and ask them to update it, but it looks like that is what I have to do. Is anyone using recommendations over a year? Thanks

By the way (This is totally off subject) I am also from UCLA with a 32 (8, 11, 13) Q and 3.65 overall and 3.6 science. However I am concerned because I only have two interviews. I completed most of my apps in late Aug, early Sept....do you think I am just being paranoid about my numbers or does it take longer for interview invites? Thanks again.
 

pocwana

MD/MBA candidate c/o 2008
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
May 11, 2002
1,128
3
L.A.
www-scf.usc.edu
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
First thing I'd do, call Baylor and tell them your situation. They probably have the time limit on there so people don't use letters from several years/decades ago. I'm thinkin a couple of months isn't that big of a deal.

If they say, we're very strict on this, can you go to the profs/ e-mail the profs who wrote the first letters and ask them to reprint the letters but with a different date?

g/l!
 

DarkChild

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jan 27, 2002
727
2
New York
Visit site
Status (Visible)
i say f-em.
i'm in the same situation and I'm using my slightly stale recs.
I dont think when they set up these requirements they were really taking in to consideration people who have been out of academia for a while.
dont sweat it - I bet they either a) dont notice b) notice and dont care c) notice and realize you've been working for a while.
good luck!
 
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
About the Ads