- Joined
- Nov 12, 2009
- Messages
- 4,830
- Reaction score
- 2,702
Hi guys,
First I am typing this from my phone, so please excuse any typos, etc.
This recent development of Medicare reimbursements released to the public (and the suspicions that it is more strategy on the government's part than mere "transparency") had me thinking about leverage that outside entities yield over psychiatry compared to other specialties.
For example, I know the overall trend and projection for medicine as a whole (at least according to SDN) is elimination of PP with transition to a hospital-based employment model.
I can see with new regulations and comparatively outrageous startup costs/overhead it might be tempting for surgical specialties to sell the boat and float into the hospital's port for all their procedures...
I have a somewhat harder time fitting psychiatrists into the grand plan of things. It seems that it is rather straightforward to set up shop with (comparatively) low initial startup costs/risk. It seems that psych is well positioned to (comparatively) overcome medicare reimbursement manipulation by simply going cash (say in opposition to ortho).
With all the private practice psychiatrists in my region, I also find it hard to picture a scenario where the local hospital systems would be eager to buyout and absorb all these practices. Both due to psych's (comparatively) lower profit margin, etc.
Plus the issue of other providers that bill insurance for therapy/etc... np's... therapists... lcsw's... psychologists.... do all these people get regulated and absorbed too? It is hard to imagine.
Overall I am trying to get your opinion on how the future could play out. Obviously no one knows for certain, but conjecture from those with experience in the field is better than conjecture of med students.
First I am typing this from my phone, so please excuse any typos, etc.
This recent development of Medicare reimbursements released to the public (and the suspicions that it is more strategy on the government's part than mere "transparency") had me thinking about leverage that outside entities yield over psychiatry compared to other specialties.
For example, I know the overall trend and projection for medicine as a whole (at least according to SDN) is elimination of PP with transition to a hospital-based employment model.
I can see with new regulations and comparatively outrageous startup costs/overhead it might be tempting for surgical specialties to sell the boat and float into the hospital's port for all their procedures...
I have a somewhat harder time fitting psychiatrists into the grand plan of things. It seems that it is rather straightforward to set up shop with (comparatively) low initial startup costs/risk. It seems that psych is well positioned to (comparatively) overcome medicare reimbursement manipulation by simply going cash (say in opposition to ortho).
With all the private practice psychiatrists in my region, I also find it hard to picture a scenario where the local hospital systems would be eager to buyout and absorb all these practices. Both due to psych's (comparatively) lower profit margin, etc.
Plus the issue of other providers that bill insurance for therapy/etc... np's... therapists... lcsw's... psychologists.... do all these people get regulated and absorbed too? It is hard to imagine.
Overall I am trying to get your opinion on how the future could play out. Obviously no one knows for certain, but conjecture from those with experience in the field is better than conjecture of med students.
Last edited: