Location of spinal cord enlargements...???

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Jumb0

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
239
Reaction score
113
A lot of sources, including my professor's notes, say that the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord is found in the L1-S3 region of the spinal cord and that it is superior to the conus medullaris...Uhhh, how is that possible when the conus medullaris terminates at L2 ??? If the terminal part of the spinal cord is at L2, how does the "enlargement" continue all the way to S3?

Is there something painfully obvious that I'm missing?

EDIT: I think I may have figured it out. When they say that the conus medullaris occurs at L2, they are referring to the vertebra (not the spinal cord segment), whereas the enlargement location is given in terms of spinal cord segments (which are not adjacent to the vertebra of corresponding # because the spinal nerve must travel inferiorly in the cauda equina before it exits the spinal cord inferior to the corresponding vertebra). Is this correct?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
A lot of sources, including my professor's notes, say that the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord is found in the L1-S3 region of the spinal cord and that it is superior to the conus medullaris...Uhhh, how is that possible when the conus medullaris terminates at L2 ??? If the terminal part of the spinal cord is at L2, how does the "enlargement" continue all the way to S3?

Is there something painfully obvious that I'm missing?

EDIT: I think I may have figured it out. When they say that the conus medullaris occurs at L2, they are referring to the vertebra (not the spinal cord segment), whereas the enlargement location is given in terms of spinal cord segments (which are not adjacent to the vertebra of corresponding # because the spinal nerve must travel inferiorly in the cauda equina before it exits the spinal cord inferior to the corresponding vertebra). Is this correct?
:thumbup: your edit.
 
Is there something painfully obvious that I'm missing?
Seems you got it
The part about it being superior to conus medullaris seems awfully redundant, as it has to be superior by definition.

Also, semantics I suppose but spinal nerves do not travel that far down. The roots that make up the cauda equina travel to their respective IVF where they combine to become nerves.

The lumbar enlargement is also quite obvious if you look at the conus medullaris. It gets fat right before it tapers off.
 
Top