• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Long academic history...

kamandsam

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Nov 17, 2008
83
0
0
California
  1. Fellow [Any Field]
I consider myself a non-traditional student as I'm 28 with 3 children and am currently pursuing a PhD.

My question is does anyone have experience (insight) into the way an applicant would be viewed based on the following:

I started college when I was 17 and messed around for 2 years earning an incredible 1.75 GPA for 60 credit hours. I stopped school and returned two years later. Since that date I expedited my undergraduate experience where I took as many as 26 credit hours per term. Not including the first 2 years I have a respectable 3.5 GPA for my BS. I did a Master's in environmental science with a GPA of 3.45, wherein I took a few med school courses (long story) and did well. I also earned a few fellowships and awards. In brief I have basically been in college for 10 years. How would the admissions team look at this history?

Thank you for your help!
 

bjhath

Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Jul 29, 2007
412
6
151
Bay Area
  1. Dentist
I consider myself a non-traditional student as I'm 28 with 3 children and am currently pursuing a PhD.

My question is does anyone have experience (insight) into the way an applicant would be viewed based on the following:

I started college when I was 17 and messed around for 2 years earning an incredible 1.75 GPA for 60 credit hours. I stopped school and returned two years later. Since that date I expedited my undergraduate experience where I took as many as 26 credit hours per term. Not including the first 2 years I have a respectable 3.5 GPA for my BS. I did a Master's in environmental science with a GPA of 3.45, wherein I took a few med school courses (long story) and did well. I also earned a few fellowships and awards. In brief I have basically been in college for 10 years. How would the admissions team look at this history?

Thank you for your help!

Your situation doesn't sound much different than mine:
I am 33 and married, no kids though. I started college out of high school at a military academy and left after two years with a whopping 2.2 for ~70 semester units. I took some time off, but returned a couple of years later and finished both my bachelor's (3.3 GPA) and master's (3.3 GPA) in mechanical engineering at Cal. I then worked for several years at a national lab before transitioning to dentistry. I have been taking prerequisites for the past two years. And yesterday, I was accepted to UoP! :banana:

I think you can definitely sell yourself as being a mature, experienced applicant. In my PS, I briefly touched on my poor academic performance and subsequent successes, saying something like, "life experience has shown me I can accomplish anything I pursue...though I did not perform well when i first started college...I returned focused and mature and have excelled at..." and then go into your PhD/fellowships/family/etc.

As long as you demonstrate strengths in other areas as well (community service, dental shadowing/etc., leadership) then I think you can definitely sell yourself.

Good luck!
 
Last edited:

kamandsam

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Nov 17, 2008
83
0
0
California
  1. Fellow [Any Field]
Your situation doesn't sound much different than mine:
I am 33 and married, no kids though. I started college out of high school at a military academy and left after two years with a whopping 2.2 for ~70 semester units. I took some time off, but returned a couple of years later and finished both my bachelor's (3.3 GPA) and master's (3.3 GPA) in mechanical engineering at Cal. I then worked for several years at a national lab before transitioning to dentistry. I have been taking prerequisites for the past two years. And yesterday, I was accepted to UoP! :banana:

I think you can definitely sell yourself as being a mature, experienced applicant. In my PS, I briefly touched on my poor academic performance and subsequent successes, saying something like, "life experience has shown me I can accomplish anything I pursue...though I did not perform well when i first started college...I returned focused and mature and have excelled at..." and then go into your PhD/fellowships/family/etc.

As long as you demonstrate strengths in other areas as well (community service, dental shadowing/etc., leadership) then I think you can definitely sell yourself.

Good luck!


Thank you for your response. It is so great to hear that you were successful, especially considering our similarities. I really appreciate it.
 
About the Ads

ean

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jul 23, 2007
33
0
0
  1. Dental Student
My situation is somewhat similar. I actually just posted my path through dental application yesterday. The post was titled '4 years - it can happen' or something like that; feel free to read over it. To make a long story short, I had a poor GPA early on, took a few years to improve it, and I will be completing a Masters in June. Yesterday, I received two acceptances to dental school, so I definitely think it is possible for you to get accepted. If this is what you want to do, then I suggest that you pursue it whole-heartedly. If you are going to be completing a PhD, then you should be golden. With a PhD, you should definitely get some interviews, in my opinion. Every year, it is a crap shoot as to who will get accepted and who won't, but if this is what you want to do, then pursue it, even if it takes a few years. In the end, it will be worth it. Best of luck in your endeavors.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.