Hello everyone,
I wanted to know if getting a 1 year masters in science would be beneficial for someone who has a sub 3.0 gpa. First year of university my dad suffered a heart attack, second year of university my mom became paralyzed from Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy illness. Because of this my first two years of university were nothing but Cs and Ds. Third and fourth year was when my gpa was around 3.4 3.5. I had done extremely well in almost all of my classes (eg. Chem 1 - A-, Chem 2 AB, Orgo 1 - A, Biochem A, etc) I know i am capable of having a higher gpa then i have right now but i wanted to know what would be my best option. I am writing the DAT in November and hoping to do well. Should i go back to school and do a post bacc or apply for a masters program? The problem with a post bacc i think is that my gpa wouldnt increase too much but if i did a masters, dent schools will see a separate GPA with upper level science courses.
Thank you
I wanted to know if getting a 1 year masters in science would be beneficial for someone who has a sub 3.0 gpa. First year of university my dad suffered a heart attack, second year of university my mom became paralyzed from Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy illness. Because of this my first two years of university were nothing but Cs and Ds. Third and fourth year was when my gpa was around 3.4 3.5. I had done extremely well in almost all of my classes (eg. Chem 1 - A-, Chem 2 AB, Orgo 1 - A, Biochem A, etc) I know i am capable of having a higher gpa then i have right now but i wanted to know what would be my best option. I am writing the DAT in November and hoping to do well. Should i go back to school and do a post bacc or apply for a masters program? The problem with a post bacc i think is that my gpa wouldnt increase too much but if i did a masters, dent schools will see a separate GPA with upper level science courses.
Thank you