Since it's interview season, I thought this might be an appropriate topic to discuss.
I remember when I was on the interview trail, this was commonly asked about.
However, the purpose of this thread is not to identify malignant programs, but to define it.
Without naming any particular programs, what is the standard definition of a "malignant" OMFS program?
I have heard people say "the attendings are malignant"; which have ranged from attendings constantly "pimping" their residents, cursing at their residents and even throwing instruments in the OR. But I've also seen other ways a program can be "malignant" that's not just limited to attendings. Chief and/or upper level residents can have "malignant" behavior as well; which also brings up my next question...
What defines a person as "malignant"? Could it be a chief that forces his/her intern to stay in the hospital for 10 hours for no reason, do ridiculous scut work, cursing or yelling at their interns, etc.
Is it the attendings, the residents or the combination of both that makes a program considered "malignant"?
Current residents or OMFS graduates, your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
I remember when I was on the interview trail, this was commonly asked about.
However, the purpose of this thread is not to identify malignant programs, but to define it.
Without naming any particular programs, what is the standard definition of a "malignant" OMFS program?
I have heard people say "the attendings are malignant"; which have ranged from attendings constantly "pimping" their residents, cursing at their residents and even throwing instruments in the OR. But I've also seen other ways a program can be "malignant" that's not just limited to attendings. Chief and/or upper level residents can have "malignant" behavior as well; which also brings up my next question...
What defines a person as "malignant"? Could it be a chief that forces his/her intern to stay in the hospital for 10 hours for no reason, do ridiculous scut work, cursing or yelling at their interns, etc.
Is it the attendings, the residents or the combination of both that makes a program considered "malignant"?
Current residents or OMFS graduates, your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.