Malpractice article worth reading...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

gomizzou

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
106
Reaction score
2
Today in the NYTimes there is an article about the weak correlation between malpractice claims and insurance premiums. The article can be found at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/22/b...&partner=rssuserland&pagewanted=all&position=
Registration (free) is required.
If you just want a summary and a copy of the figure you can go to:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_02/005703.php

I think that it is crazy that the premiums vary so widely between states. I don't know an easy way to get the rates under control.
What does everyone else think?

Members don't see this ad.
 
gomizzou said:
I think that it is crazy that the premiums vary so widely between states. I don't know an easy way to get the rates under control.
What does everyone else think?

I don't understand why there is such a huge difference either. But i think i should move to Nebraska....
 
Thanks for the link!

We're talking about malpractice in my health econ course. One thing that's been proposed is panels to vet claims so the frivolous ones don't go anywhere; of course, the problem is who would have the knowledge to be on the panel without having conflicts of interest. From an econ standpoint, I find it really interesting that there's just a weak correlation between claims (cost to the insurers) and premiums (prices).

I think any effective reform is going to have to address all the players: doctors, patients, insurers, and the legal system.
 
Top