masturbation & prostate cancer

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HK42

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Is excessive masterbation linked to prostate hyperplasia? I mean it seems they would be. What about the opposite, a monk? Are they protected? Any thoughts?

Did you know the founder of Kellogg's corn flakes was a Quaker doctor who believed certain foods encouraged masterbation (e.g. meats, cheeses) while others discouraged it (e.g. grains), and that the cereal was started as an anti-masterbation food. The man had a whole system for spotting a masterbater (e.g. glossy look in an adolescent's eyes) and was for female circumcision.

Members don't see this ad.
 
This is the closest thing to a definitive study. Basically there was not much correlation between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer. There was a small correlation between high ejaculation frequency and decreased risk for prostate cancer.


Leitzmann MF, Platz EA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Giovannucci E.
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Md 20892, USA. [email protected]

CONTEXT: Sexual activity has been hypothesized to play a role in the development of prostate cancer, but epidemiological data are virtually limited to case-control studies, which may be prone to bias because recall among individuals with prostate cancer could be distorted as a consequence of prostate malignancy or ongoing therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between ejaculation frequency, which includes sexual intercourse, nocturnal emission, and masturbation and risk of prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study using follow-up data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (February 1, 1992, through January 31, 2000) of 29 342 US men aged 46 to 81 years, who provided information on history of ejaculation frequency on a self-administered questionnaire in 1992 and responded to follow-up questionnaires every 2 years to 2000. Ejaculation frequency was assessed by asking participants to report the average number of ejaculations they had per month during the ages of 20 to 29 years, 40 to 49 years, and during the past year (1991). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of total prostate cancer. RESULTS: During 222 426 person-years of follow-up, there were 1449 new cases of total prostate cancer, 953 organ-confined cases, and 147 advanced cases of prostate cancer. Most categories of ejaculation frequency were unrelated to risk of prostate cancer. However, high ejaculation frequency was related to decreased risk of total prostate cancer. The multivariate relative risks for men reporting 21 or more ejaculations per month compared with men reporting 4 to 7 ejaculations per month at ages 20 to 29 years were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.10); ages 40 to 49 years, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.86); previous year, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.88); and averaged across a lifetime, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.89). Similar associations were observed for organ-confined prostate cancer. Ejaculation frequency was not statistically significantly associated with risk of advanced prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ejaculation frequency is not related to increased risk of prostate cancer.
 
Damn it, you're telling me I've been doing it for nothing...
 
Members don't see this ad :)
what the big deal.....my family doc has been doing it for me since I was a kid....he insists

.you mean to say?....what the?.....
 
Is excessive masterbation linked to prostate hyperplasia? .

BPH (hyperplasia) is not related to prostate cancer - seperate problems. BPH does not cause cancer - different zones of the prostate.

Estrogen is one strong link to prostate cancer (as are vasectomies). Testosterone (endogenous or exogenous has not been linked to increased rates of prostate cancer), in fact low testosterone is linked to the most aggresive prostate cancers.

Minerva Endocrinol. 2006 Mar;31(1):1-12. Links
Aromatase and prostate cancer.

Ellem SJ, Risbridger GP.
Centre for Urological Research, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
The normal growth and development of the prostate requires the presence and action of androgens, which are also known risk factors in the origins of benign and malignant prostate disease. Paradoxically, the incidence of prostate disease increases with age when serum androgen levels are in decline and emerging evidence suggests that estrogens may also be important in the normal prostate, as well as in the etiology of prostate disease. Both estrogen receptor subtypes are present in the prostate, demonstrating that the gland responds directly to estrogens. Recent data suggests that estrogens play a role in prostate disease and has demonstrated that high doses of estrogens induce premalignant dysplasia and in combination with high doses of androgens, malignancy. The production of estrogens from androgens is mediated by the aromatase enzyme, the aberrant expression of which plays a critical role in the disease process in other tissues, most notably the breast. The prostate expresses aromatase within the stroma of benign tissue, while in malignancy there is an induction of epithelial expression with altered promoter utilisation. Although the presence of aromatase in the prostate and its aberrant expression in prostate cancer is significant, its role and contribution to prostate carcinogenesis remains unclear. Transgenic mouse models lacking aromatase (ArKO) and over-expressing aromatase (AROM+) have provided an ideal means to examine aromatase expression in the prostate. Studies using these animals may lead to a better understanding of the role that aromatase--and therefore estrogen--plays in the development and progression of prostate disease.
============================================
Vasectomy and prostate cancer:
JAMA. 1993 Feb 17;269(7):873-7. .
A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.

Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC.
Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
OBJECTIVE--To examine prospectively the relationship between vasectomy and prostate cancer. DESIGN--Cohort study. SETTING--Health professionals (dentists, veterinarians, osteopaths, optometrists, pharmacists, and podiastrists) in the United States. PARTICIPANTS--There were 10,055 male members of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, aged 40 to 75 years, who had had a vasectomy, and 37,800 members who had not had a vasectomy at the time of study entry in 1986. These participants had provided detailed information on various life-style variables including diet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Diagnosis of prostate cancer. RESULTS--Between 1986 and 1990, 300 new cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in participants who were initially free of diagnosed cancer. Vasectomy was associated with an elevated risk of prostate cancer (age-adjusted relative risk, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 2.21; P = .0004). This elevated risk persisted after excluding 21 stage A1 cases (age-adjusted relative risk, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 2.11; P = .004). Among men who had their vasectomy at least 22 years in the past (before 1965), the risk of prostate cancer was even higher (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 2.72; P = .002). This elevated risk among men with vasectomy did not appear to be caused by detection bias and persisted when we controlled for diet, level of physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, educational level, body mass index, and geographical area of residence. CONCLUSIONS--These results support evidence from other epidemiologic studies that vasectomy increases risk of prostate cancer. The consistency of results among various epidemiologic studies, the increase of risk over time following vasectomy, the apparent lack of confounding or bias, and the existence of physiological changes in the prostate following vasectomy suggest that the association may be causal.
 
Kellogg was no Quaker. He was a Seventh Day Adventist. Don't get your minority religions confused; there's very little in common with the two. Quakers are one of the most sexually open and aware Western religions. Most Quaker Meetings in the US have same-sex marriage, and some have had it since the early 1980's.

This is a quote from the Philadelphia Faith and Practice: "Friends [Quakers] are wary of a preset moral code to govern sexual activity"

http://www.quaker.org/sexuality/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg
 
Kellogg was no Quaker. He was a Seventh Day Adventist. Don't get your minority religions confused; there's very little in common with the two. Quakers are one of the most sexually open and aware Western religions. Most Quaker Meetings in the US have same-sex marriage, and some have had it since the early 1980's.

This is a quote from the Philadelphia Faith and Practice: "Friends [Quakers] are wary of a preset moral code to govern sexual activity"

http://www.quaker.org/sexuality/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg

Being a Quaker sounds like a lot of fun.
 
Let's start a prospective cohort study. We all jack it like there's no tomorrow and see how many of us wind up with the big C 50 years from now :)
 
Yet another reason that its good to be a woman :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yet another reason that its good to be a woman :p

not really, when you consider that testicular and prostate cancers are 2 of the few cancers which aren't an automatic death sentence. And in the former's case, even when there are mets.
 
It might not give you prostate cancer but it causes male pattern baldness.
 
It might not give you prostate cancer but it causes male pattern baldness.


maybe maybe not it is linked to cancer. as with all other cancer, they can caused by **** loads of things, radiation,food, genes, habits, smoking, exposure to chemicals, and when youre doing a research it is somewhat a holy grail to isolate this factors so as to substantiate a claim, because you are studying persons and you cant control evrything and you can never be too accurate.

i maybe giving this reason because i dont want to stop wanking.haha.

i do somehow think it may lead to BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia). most tissues with increased production or action will lead to increase in mass such that if your using your arms to lift you get big muscles, if your heart is loaded you get big heart (cardiomegaly), thus if you excrete prostatic fluid often, it has to increase production thus the increase in size.
 
Damn it, you're telling me I've been doing it for nothing...

Hey, Dr. Cox said giving yourself the "low five" helps take the edge off for the work day. I swear that man was my driving force for the medical field...sad huh?
 
Hello, everyone! It’s very nice to meet all of you. I’m 63 and am about to begin some prostate cancer treatments. The doxorubicin they’re prescribing me seems manageable price-wise. They’re telling me that I should also look into Viagra to go with the doxorubicin. My issue is that I’m not making a lot of money, right now, and I was wondering if anyone had any ideas as to how I can save some money. Unofficially, my Dr. suggesting looking into alternatives such as “generics” and gave me some reassurance that Canadian pharmacies might be a good option but I’m very nervous about getting into something I know nothing about and risking my health. Does anyone happen to have any insight about this, or has anyone ordered from any of these sources? Please let me know as soon as possible. Feel free to message me privately if you prefer that to posting publicly. Thank you so much for your time, support, and allowing me to join such a great group of people for my own education.
SDN is not the place for medical advice. I wish you the best in your cancer treatment, but would strongly urge you to discuss your issue on a more appropriate forum.
 
I think even masturbation is good for health.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top