# math problem

Discussion in 'MCAT Study Question Q&A' started by inaccensa, Aug 6, 2011.

1. ### inaccensa 7+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 5, 2008
Messages:
511
1
Status:
Medical Student
2^X =1/4

2. ### MD Odyssey 2+ Year Member

Joined:
Jun 26, 2010
Messages:
412
11
You can solve for X explicitly by taking the base-2 logarithm of both sides, but you should probably be able to realize that 1/4 is just 1/2^2 = 2^(-2) by inspection.

Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
3. OP

### inaccensa 7+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 5, 2008
Messages:
511
1
Status:
Medical Student

great thanks. i know its simple,but I couldnt understand it

4. OP

### inaccensa 7+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 5, 2008
Messages:
511
1
Status:
Medical Student
so its xlog 2 = log (1/4)
x log 2 = log (-4)
just substituting the numbers, right

5. ### tn4596 5+ Year Member

Joined:
Jul 23, 2011
Messages:
845
10
Status:
Medical Student
first of all, there is no log of a negative number. log(-4) doesnt exist. because exponent of something is always positive.

secondly, forget the log, it will just make it more confusing, there is no reason to solve for log with no other base than 10...
1/(2^2) = 2^(-2)
anytime you see X^Y = 1/Z
just solve for X^Y = Z, then put a negative on the Y.

6. OP

### inaccensa 7+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 5, 2008
Messages:
511
1
Status:
Medical Student
yeah I meant in the next step - log (4)..Thanks tn4596, it makes more sense now.

7. ### MD Odyssey 2+ Year Member

Joined:
Jun 26, 2010
Messages:
412
11
I've attached a proof so that you can see how to actually solve for x. The rules for logarithmic operations aren't terribly complicated and it's probably not a bad idea to learn them. Hope this is helpful.

A previous responder tried to give you a rule for calculating logs, which can be somewhat misleading. I would simply learn how to use logarithms instead of trying to memorize a rule that isn't always applicable.

Also, not to be rude, but you can take the log of a negative number, it just winds up being complex and multi-valued. This is similar to how one can take the square root of a negative number and get a complex and multi-valued result (e.g., the square root of -4 equals +2i and -2i).

#### Attached Files:

• ###### solve-for-x-proof.png
File size:
1.7 KB
Views:
1
Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
#7
Last edited: Aug 9, 2011
8. ### neurodoc Neurologist 10+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 1, 2003
Messages:
451
44
Status:
Attending Physician
It's really very simple, and you don't need to take logs (or ln's).

2^x= 1/4 means "2 raised to what power equals 1/4. Obviously (1/2)^2=1/4. Reciprocal powers (1/n)^x are defined as n^-x, so that gives you the general answer. The answer in this particular case is "-2".

9. ### MD Odyssey 2+ Year Member

Joined:
Jun 26, 2010
Messages:
412
11
I agree. You don't - and shouldn't - need to use logs for this problem. But, I wanted to be complete since I had mentioned it in my original response.

Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
10. OP

### inaccensa 7+ Year Member

Joined:
Sep 5, 2008
Messages:
511
1
Status:
Medical Student
I prefer logs, since i understand them better

We’ve been on the Internet for over 20 years doing just one thing: providing career information for free or at cost. We do this because we believe that the health education process is too expensive and too competitive.

We believe that all students deserve the same access to high quality information. We believe that providing high quality career advice and information ensures that everyone, regardless of income or privilege, has a chance to achieve their dream of being a doctor.