Hi all,
I know there are several variants of this question floating around, but after looking at them I am still unclear about which route I should choose. Right now, I am applying to medical schools and have only applied for straight MD programs. I love research, but I am hesitant about making a career out of it. From what I've been told, you really have to commit to either clinical or research in your career. You can try to manage considerable amounts of both, but you won't go too far. I'm not delusional; I know I probably won't get a Nobel Prize or develop a world-changing drug.
2. I am apprehensive about pursuing a career in research in part due to the excessive amount of politics and bull**** associated with getting grant funding and publications. Also, as indicated up top, finances are not an issue, so the free med school plus stipend this is not really a draw for me. Again, I've only applied to straight MD programs at this point as I am still developing my interests (might pursue MD/MBA instead), and the idea of spending an extra three or four years in school for a phd doesn't really sound all that appealing to me.
I guess what I'm getting at is the question of how much research can I realistically do with just an MD? I've been getting mixed reviews from this forum about how important it is to have a phd in building a successful laboratory.
I know there are several variants of this question floating around, but after looking at them I am still unclear about which route I should choose. Right now, I am applying to medical schools and have only applied for straight MD programs. I love research, but I am hesitant about making a career out of it. From what I've been told, you really have to commit to either clinical or research in your career. You can try to manage considerable amounts of both, but you won't go too far. I'm not delusional; I know I probably won't get a Nobel Prize or develop a world-changing drug.
2. I am apprehensive about pursuing a career in research in part due to the excessive amount of politics and bull**** associated with getting grant funding and publications. Also, as indicated up top, finances are not an issue, so the free med school plus stipend this is not really a draw for me. Again, I've only applied to straight MD programs at this point as I am still developing my interests (might pursue MD/MBA instead), and the idea of spending an extra three or four years in school for a phd doesn't really sound all that appealing to me.
I guess what I'm getting at is the question of how much research can I realistically do with just an MD? I've been getting mixed reviews from this forum about how important it is to have a phd in building a successful laboratory.