•••quote:•••Originally posted by psyche:
•You're right that Penn is second in NIH funding, and has been for the past four years. This is pretty unimportant, but the information I got from NIH web page shows Johns Hopkins as #1 in NIH funding for the last ten years, not Harvard, which doesn't even make the top ten. This seemed strange to me too but go look at NIH web site if you don't believe me. I'm not sure where U.S News gets 700 million figure. Perhaps that includes MGH and other affiliated hospitals.•••••Indeed, as Jot says, this includes all of the affiliated hospitals. . .
BUT... I don't agree that its questionable as to whether this is a 'good idea.' Seriously, this is TOTALLY relevant!! Although research may be at the Brigham or Beth Israel, it's HMS research. . . that labs are affiliated with one hospital or another isn't nearly as important as the research performed by the umbrella organization.
I work at BIDMC, one of Harvard's big hospitals -- and it's less about being at Beth Israel and more about Harvard Medical School -- even though the school itself doesn't do that much research on campus.
Hopkins can go on and on about research, but after being in this field for a while, I can tell you that there are many other organizations with more prestiege than Hopkins (as far as research; this doesn't extend clinically, where Hopkins is top of its game) -- these include: Penn, Rockefeller (NYC), Univ. of Washington, UCLA, UCSF, Columbia, WUSTL, among others.
Ultimately, it's the total $$ that matters, and because Harvard has SO many great hospitals, they have the most research period.
Harvard wasn't on that list because there's no 'Harvard' hospital -- I'll bet that one or more of the following appears, however:
Beth Israel Deaconess Med. Ctr.
Children's Hospital
Dana Farber
Mass. General Hosp.
Brigham and Women's Hosp.