- Joined
- Jan 31, 2013
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 254
Anyone else a little frustrated with how mental illness is portrayed after mass shootings like this? In the wake of the shooting in Las Vegas it became known that the shooter was an older, white male from Nevada with no obvious radical political or religious associations. In searching for a reason how or why this person could commit such an awful tragedy it seems the general consensus the public and media have come to is to put the blame on "mental illness". I'm not saying this guy did or did not have a mental illness, and some would probably argue that committing a mass murder is basically diagnostic of some sort of mental illness (ASPD?). However, I feel like the tone people are taking against "mental illness" is absolutely destructive. There is already a significant stigma against mental illness, now people will assume everyone with any mental illness is liable to commit mass murder. The Jimmy Kimmel video going around the web () takes what I felt was a very harsh tone against everyone with mental illness. The fraction of people with any mental illness who have a tendency to be violent is minuscule. It actually reminds me a lot of the rhetoric against muslims after terrorist attacks. This talk of mental illness comes up after every mass shooting committed by a white person and I just don't know how to be more productive or accurate in where to place blame and suggest solutions.
Also, if laws were enacted as suggested in the Jimmy Kimmel video to ban gun sales to people with mental illness, would the responsibility be on psychiatrists to decide who can and can't get guns? Jimmy says to ban gun sales to everyone with mental illness but that is ridiculous. Someone with GAD or MDD should probably be able to buy a gun. Would certain diagnoses automatically prohibit a person from buying guns, or would a history of violence or certain risk factors be needed? Do you think a law like this could ever work out in a productive, fair manner? I haven't heard anything about the most recent shooter being diagnosed with any mental illness so I really don't understand where this is coming from.
Also, if laws were enacted as suggested in the Jimmy Kimmel video to ban gun sales to people with mental illness, would the responsibility be on psychiatrists to decide who can and can't get guns? Jimmy says to ban gun sales to everyone with mental illness but that is ridiculous. Someone with GAD or MDD should probably be able to buy a gun. Would certain diagnoses automatically prohibit a person from buying guns, or would a history of violence or certain risk factors be needed? Do you think a law like this could ever work out in a productive, fair manner? I haven't heard anything about the most recent shooter being diagnosed with any mental illness so I really don't understand where this is coming from.