PaladinX
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Messages
- 95
- Reaction score
- 118
Hey guys,
So I've been preparing for MMIs, and I'm confident in my ability to answer these questions. However, when practicing, I have gotten completely ridiculous questions, where I have two choices on how to answer
1. Just go with it and answer it directly. Maybe mention that the scenario is very unlikely because XYZ, then answer the question that's directly asked
2. Go into depth on why the question is unlikely, and give an account of what I would do instead to say avoid that situation and handle it better, to begin with
Example: Someone doesn't do any of the work in a group project, skip meetings, don't contribute. They show up the last day and claim that they were an equal part, what would you do. *Me in my head, ok but I would never let it get that far and would have confronted them way beforehand*
Which option sounds better?
So I've been preparing for MMIs, and I'm confident in my ability to answer these questions. However, when practicing, I have gotten completely ridiculous questions, where I have two choices on how to answer
1. Just go with it and answer it directly. Maybe mention that the scenario is very unlikely because XYZ, then answer the question that's directly asked
2. Go into depth on why the question is unlikely, and give an account of what I would do instead to say avoid that situation and handle it better, to begin with
Example: Someone doesn't do any of the work in a group project, skip meetings, don't contribute. They show up the last day and claim that they were an equal part, what would you do. *Me in my head, ok but I would never let it get that far and would have confronted them way beforehand*
Which option sounds better?