•••quote:•••Originally posted by Dodge This:
[QB]I've always believed that mneumonics are just another thing to remember. There's so much stuff to know that the last that helps me is trying to remember a mneumonic then trying to remember what it stands for. As a general study technique, I never found them useful. However, I will admit that there are really useful--these are the ones that tend to get taught as part of formatl instruction anyways.
[QB]••••This is a common misconception with mneumonics. While there is usually one extra String that needs to be learned, the effort to do this is often minimal. The reason these techniques are useful is that it links the information you are really trying to learn (the terms for anatomy etc) to some easier concept, so when you recall the concept, it automatically recalls the other information, sort of creating a symbollic link in your mind. So in essence the information is stored in a more organized manner in your memory AND stored twiuce because both the original terms and the mneumonic that links to it are "placeholders" of the information.
Other techniques such as mindmaps etc are also considered mneumonics and work by associating the information with visual space, i.e. the more sensory input you incorporate, you are, in essence, increasing the number of ways the info is stored.
For more information on this check out "Your Memory: How it works and How to Improve it" by Kenneth Higbee... he has a PhD in psychology and is considered an expert in the field of memory. Very interesting material