- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
Hello hello!
This is my first thread, so please forgive me if I post anything that is wrong and what not.
I am currently a third year undergrad at UPenn, studying Chemistry/Philosophy/History. I want to do an MD/PhD in history of medicine, but I couldn't find too many resources that were dedicated to that - I was wondering if there were any MD/PhD peeps out there who were completing a PhD in history of medicine, and what would be helpful for admissions?
Thank you so much for your time!
sunnypiano6
Hello hello!
I am currently a third year undergrad at UPenn, studying Chemistry/Philosophy/History. I want to do an MD/PhD in history of medicine, but I couldn't find too many resources that were dedicated to that - I was wondering if there were any MD/PhD peeps out there who were completing a PhD in history of medicine, and what would be helpful for admissions?
To be able to publish in the humanities or social sciences does not require a PhD, if you have an MD already. You will be bringing to the table knowledge not shared by the humanists. All that is needed is some experience with historical research.
Unfortunately, the humanities and social sciences are infected with a steady supply of ideologically motivated research. So, be prepared to read a lot of Marx and Lenin.
The same could be said of biology and other fields.
To be able to publish in the humanities or social sciences does not require a PhD, if you have an MD already. You will be bringing to the table knowledge not shared by the humanists. All that is needed is some experience with historical research.
what would be helpful for admissions?
I decided I wanted research that had correlation to clinical aspects which my previous research did not really offer, so I changed to a different lab (which I will probably stay at) - I've been doing cancer research/cell biology work...yet I don't know how helpful this will be when I apply to MD/PhD. I know that MD/PhD's need a lot of research...but everyone I knew did a science PhD, so they told me to get a lot of research in the natural sciences. The thing I didn't realize is that social science PhD's might want something else, say philosophy or history research.
One thing: I do realize that the non-science PhD takes a lot longer than general science PhD's, when done through the MSTP. The reason why I want to pursue this track however, is because in the end, I would like to have a career at a medical university that combines teaching, clinical research, and patient care. I don't mind the time either...if it's at an institution I really love, then I feel that extra time wouldn't really matter as much (not saying that it doesn't at all...but I want a good educational background that would help start my career on a strong foundation)
Also...does anyone know of any other places that offer this through the MSTP/MDPhD program? I know of Harvard, Yale, Penn, UCSF, Johns Hopkins...but realistically, these places are very difficult to get into, and I was wondering if anyone knew of different institutions that I could apply to other than just the 5.
I'll politely disagree with some, however, about the quality of historical research by PhDs. Some are excellent, but so much historical research is ideologically corrupted as to make me discount a PhD unless I read their work. I have found as much good historical work done by non-academics as by academics.
I like amateur historians in a way, because they are still motivated by interest and a degree of naivete. Academics are often motivated by what will get them published and promoted, which results in the death of many trees.