Gee, it's nice to see another debate of this topic in this forum. This started out to be a pretty benign topic, I thought.
As I've been told I'll argue with a wall if it'll argue back, here's a go at it:
Now you dont have MDs bashing DOs, you've got DOs bashing MDs somehow trying to prove they are superior.
Where was anyone claiming that a D.O. was "superior to an MD"? The above posts were relating personal stories on how they arrived at the decision to become an osteopathic physician, inlcluding encouragement from allopathic physicians. Let's not twist words drastically... these are opinions, leave it at that.
MDs can do everything that DOs can do. There are many programs where MDs can get training in OMM if they want it.
This is in fact wrong, and right. MDs can learn and offer OMM, but can you name 3 MDs who you know offer OMM or are at the least interested in it? You go to the allo board and it's discounted to the level of hocus-pocus, slightly below a chiro. Fine with me. Less competition. Funny that they'll send their patients to a PT though
MDs cant bill for OMT or even supervise a student offering OMT to a patient. Simple as that, hence, from a very superficial level, D.O.s can "do" more, at least legally.
As far as the monopoly of "holistic care" we all know it's a marketing tool. The fact is, D.O.s are taught with an underlying philosophy, whereas MDs are not, at least not one that hasnt been articulated to date. If you can articulate the allopathic philosophy to me, please do. If MDs want to come out with a flag to fly, go for it. Medicine is becoming more "holistic" overall, D.O.s just were the first to claim it as their own. Read the NY Times article posted in the osteo form, it sounds like the D.O. philosophy verbatim, but it's from an MD. In order to back up the "holistic banner", D.O.s have offered the 500+ hours of training in OMM which is built on the ideas of reciprocality in structure and function. Even if you never use the techniques in practice, the training alone forces you to consider life in a holistic, almost gaia-like ideology. Combine that with an offered rotating internship that exposes a young doc to a wide cross-section of medicine, and the body, you have a slightly more "holistic" approach to medicine than the current allopathic brand. However, nowhere does the D.O. curricula include more classes on "caring" or "compassion". Anyone who claims that needs to be evaluated.
Anyway, sorry to add fuel to the fire. It's late and I'm punchy from board review. I think the original post was a good idea, and likewise, if there's anyone out there who's parent is a D.O. and wouldnt let their kid go to an osteopathic school, post away. Let's play fair.