I've long advocated that the best solution to CRNA militancy is a return to basic economics, ie, supply and demand. An increase in the supply of anesthesia midlevels will lead to a decrease in their salaries (which is more effective than anything else in getting their attention since as everyone knows money talks). Once the CRNA's are struggling for jobs, anesthesiologists can begin to demand that AA's get hired in their groups (over the objections of the financially weakened and scared CRNA's). Eventually, anesthesiologists can even replace their CRNA's with AA's. The goal should be at least 50% of AA's in most practice groups.
How will CRNA's respond by an increase in number of AA schools? They can reduce the CRNA pipeline so that the total number of anesthesia midlevels produced is reduced annually. However, AA's can take advantage of this by further increasing their number of schools. Hence, the CRNA's are in a lose-lose situation with the increasing number of AA schools.
I'll try not to shed a tear for them.
I wonder if my posts and arguments over the years helped to influence some of these decision-makers regarding AA's. If so, I'm glad I was able to contribute.