- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,507
- Reaction score
- 337
FTFA said:The total cost of ownership of the system over its projected 18-year life cycle, once estimated at $11 billion, “we think now it will be $9 billion,” said Frank Kendall, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.
FTFA said:However, only one-third of the contract will be for a fixed amount, he said. The rest will be on a “cost plus” basis.
They picked Cerner over Epic. Terrible choice. I use both on a near daily basis and Cerner is clearly inferior. The "powerplans" and note templates are nowhere near as efficient. This was politics and lobbying at its worst. Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Can we please be happy about this? At least for a day or two?
I have used both and thought they were pretty comperable. Also it sounds the the concerns from Epic were price point and its interoperability with non Epic EMRs, neother of which I could speak to.
Anyway the point is they managed to successfully select a real EMR that is good enough that major hospitals across the nation have seen fit to use it. No obscure new system no one has ever heard of that lobbied its way into existence. No lowest bidder system that is too low quality for major hospitals to use. No 'we couldn't do it' and 10 more years of AHLTA. Even if this isn't your top choice this is clearly a good EMR.
Can we please be happy about this? At least for a day or two?
I have used both and thought they were pretty comperable. Also it sounds the the concerns from Epic were price point and its interoperability with non Epic EMRs, neother of which I could speak to.
Anyway the point is they managed to successfully select a real EMR that is good enough that major hospitals across the nation have seen fit to use it. No obscure new system no one has ever heard of that lobbied its way into existence. No lowest bidder system that is too low quality for major hospitals to use. No 'we couldn't do it' and 10 more years of AHLTA. Even if this isn't your top choice this is clearly a good EMR.
Can we please be happy about this? At least for a day or two?
Anything is better than that abomination AHLTA.They picked Cerner over Epic. Terrible choice. I use both on a near daily basis and Cerner is clearly inferior. The "powerplans" and note templates are nowhere near as efficient. This was politics and lobbying at its worst. Guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Epic and Cerner both are poor EMRs in my opinion. Just because they are commonly used and are better than AHLTA doesn't make them strong EMRs. I always chuckle when I get recruiting postcards and "Epic EMR" is listed as a reason to select their practice over others.
Almost no one size fits all program works well for everyone. One of the benefits will be finally putting chcs out of its misery.
As I have said many a time, "It's not which one is best - it's which one sucks the least."What EMR is better?
2. The electronic anesthesia charting system currently used by .milmed, "Innovian," is manually uploaded into Essentris as an imported .pdf. Note: all of our anesthesia machines are GE. Anyone know if Innovian slaved to a Drager automatically imports into Essentris?