- Joined
- Oct 22, 2013
- Messages
- 8,597
- Reaction score
- 19,852
I recently interviewed Dr. Asch and I thought you guys might find his replies interesting, especially regarding his article on the bubble market in NEJM that we've been discussing.
The rest of the words here are not for reproduction and are directly from Dr. Asch.
DR. ASCH: "There is already tremendous change. At times I would like to start from scratch, because I am impatient. However, there already is interdisciplinary entrepreneurship and I have found physicians to be among the most entrepreneurial people I know. But it is also complicated and inefficient and I will give you that point. There are stakeholders and there are high stakes—both clinically and economically. And most of the stakeholders have some power. Change is hard under those circumstances. Maybe doctors need to understand political science as much as they need to understand business. Put that on your training list.
A liberal arts education may in fact be the best preparation for a career in Medicine or related fields"
...
ME: The New England Journal of Medicine recently published an article of yours warning of a medical education bubble in the near future; the author cites the rise of tuition costs, a predicted shortage in physicians, and likely cuts to physician compensation as evidence. We can see a bubble quickly forming in dentistry and veterinary medicine, are medical schools next? Might there come a time when blazing passion for science and service for others will simply not be enough to justify the cost of a medical education?
DR. ASCH: "Let me be clear: I don’t think we are in a medical education bubble. But I do think it costs way too much to train doctors the way we do and we’d all be better off if, while we are busy making health care better, cheaper, and more accessible, we did the same thing for medical education. I think that is possible. In fact, I’m optimistic we can do it."
The rest of the words here are not for reproduction and are directly from Dr. Asch.
DR. ASCH: "There is already tremendous change. At times I would like to start from scratch, because I am impatient. However, there already is interdisciplinary entrepreneurship and I have found physicians to be among the most entrepreneurial people I know. But it is also complicated and inefficient and I will give you that point. There are stakeholders and there are high stakes—both clinically and economically. And most of the stakeholders have some power. Change is hard under those circumstances. Maybe doctors need to understand political science as much as they need to understand business. Put that on your training list.
A liberal arts education may in fact be the best preparation for a career in Medicine or related fields"
...
ME: The New England Journal of Medicine recently published an article of yours warning of a medical education bubble in the near future; the author cites the rise of tuition costs, a predicted shortage in physicians, and likely cuts to physician compensation as evidence. We can see a bubble quickly forming in dentistry and veterinary medicine, are medical schools next? Might there come a time when blazing passion for science and service for others will simply not be enough to justify the cost of a medical education?
DR. ASCH: "Let me be clear: I don’t think we are in a medical education bubble. But I do think it costs way too much to train doctors the way we do and we’d all be better off if, while we are busy making health care better, cheaper, and more accessible, we did the same thing for medical education. I think that is possible. In fact, I’m optimistic we can do it."