- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Messages
- 3,479
- Reaction score
- 1,722
X vs 2.5X. THAT is all. Give it up -- you just don't get it. Virtually everyone on this thread further along than you in this process is telling you you aren't understanding your own data. You have much to learn and usually when everybody else's interpretation of the facts is different than yours a smart person will take a step back and wonder whether they are the ones who are confused. To some extent your success in medicine will turn on grasping that there is much you don't know or understand. There is no shame in learning. There is in insisting that wrong is right, despite ample evidence to the contrary.
.7 to 1.7/1 to 2.5. I'm giving numbers that clearly show an advantage towards allopathic. They also show its possible as a DO. I talked to doctors who are DO dermatologists. They seemed to struggle more and had to fight more but they still got it. My point is it is possible. You can't deny that or else the .7 wouldn't exist. Even my father who is an allopathic who did residencies at great hospitals and is one of the 3 most competive allo fields admits its possible as a DO also. Harder but possible. (tbh I kinda biased toward allo if anything)