msd848

10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Nov 21, 2008
72
0
Status
Pre-Medical
Which of these books has more indepth information about physics? Has anybody tried both, which one is more adequate for mcat prep?
 

Zona Pellucida

10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Nov 17, 2008
2,446
3
Status
Medical Student
I have NOVA and am about 1/2 through it right now...

Its a great book and is very clear and to the point. The only chapter I still do not understand after a first run through is on 'Torque' but I didn't understand it in lecture either.
 

0Complications

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Oct 21, 2007
4,714
3
Status
Pre-Health (Field Undecided)
I am also using Nova. I have skipped around a bit, but I really like the explanations. It's quick and dirty, plus the end of chapter questions are great.

I can't say how it compares directly, but I can say that you won't go wrong if you opt for Nova physics.
 
About the Ads

Malayna

10+ Year Member
Nov 24, 2008
222
1
Status
Pre-Medical
Which of these books has more indepth information about physics? Has anybody tried both, which one is more adequate for mcat prep?
I'm curious about Nova too. I'm wondering if it would be worth the money to get the Nova book. Any suggestions?

I'm going to be done with my BR physics books and their inclass packets pretty soon and might want to pick up another physics book just for the questions. The BR physics and general chemistry books are wonderful, so I don't need any review. I just need to get my hands on more problems, but ones on the same caliber as BR.

I have EK and don't like it very much for physics or general chemistry. The questions don't emphasize thinking enough and the explanations are too short to be helpful. The PR material at least has passages with their questions, but I keep hearing that the real MCAT is different from PR stuff. So far their physics material has seemed okay.
 
About the Ads