I'm not sure what you mean when you say we don't have good intentions.
Yes, I've supervised over 110 cases this week and was in the OR again today. I've spent many, many hours just logging into the health record. Gotta get all 10 characters, the capitals, the numbers, and don't forget at least one punctuation mark. One mistake and it's back to square one - and that's just getting in. Asked to log in again for some strange reason. Takes about 10 illogical steps to try to place an order. Nowhere to just write a simple progress note - have to choose from a list of 5000 options, none of which really denote what I could have said in 5 seconds with a pen and paper.
Multiply that by 600 and that's a typical day in my busy OR. I treated the computer who got the bulk of my attention. Miss one jot or tittle and someone in the bowels of the hosp. will find out and I'll have to fix it in all my spare time. That could not be increasing the cost of health care could it? Obama pushed really, really hard for this. Follow the money trail and you'll have your story.
I agree 110% about what you say about the current state of electronic health records and how seriously they interfere with patient care. I've remarked in a comment above that the EHR is implicated in very serious patient morbidity and mortality. Humans cannot give full attention to treating the damn computer whilst also giving full attention to the patient. Something has to give, and since the only thing that we ever get dinged on is documentation (ie: billing for insurance companies and recording a billion useless pieces of data for lawyers) the computer is more valued than the patient. Somebody's got to care about the patient. The pressure on nurses is over the top. We need to be mad and we are overdue for a revolution, hosp. admin., health insurance exec's, and lawyers be damned....