- Joined
- Dec 13, 2006
- Messages
- 1,770
- Reaction score
- 1,112
Question to put to the group...
It seems the consensus is, Team Health is a private organization and they have the right to fire who they want, especially if they feel it makes them look bad. As do other organizations too. (I think in this particular case we all agree the Ohio lawmaker/ doctor chose his words poorly, although there's certainly disagreement as to what his intentions were).
My fear here is the slippery slope. We are increasingly seeing a narrative in these protests which states that "Silence Is Violence". So my question is, along those lines, if Team Health or another corporation began firing employees for SILENCE, would you continue to support the statement that "they're a private organization and they have the right to fire who they want, especially if they feel it makes them look bad"? If a company said, "we feel that silence is violence and any employees who refuse to go to a march and post pictures of themselves on social media showing support, will be fired", would you support that right? If not, how does that reconcile with the previous assertion that private companies have the right to do and to fire whom they want?
I mean there’s no point in this hypothetical you don’t make the RV you you don’t get your press ganney or for some reason you piss off a nurse you’re gone. You’re just a cog in the wheel. It has nothing to do with support it’s just the reality.
Also he still has his government job.
Last edited: