- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 213
Hi guys,
I have old TPR science workbook. It isn't even hyper learning. So it is prior to whenever they started calling it hyper learning (2009). Is this still good for prep? One person told me the old science workbooks from TPR are the same exact thing essentially as new hyper learning science workbooks. Is this the case? I notice the TPR seems to have more discrete questions than passages for physics..which isn't that great. Or is this because I have old book? Basically want to know if I am fine with this, or if I should try to find newer hyper learning science workbook?
I also have TBR for passages. Started sn2ed a few days ago. I feel like TBR for content is overwhelming!! Does anyone else feel this way?? To the point that they load you with minute detail, you lose big picture. So think I am going to use TPR review books for content, TPR science for passages/?'s, and TBR just for their passages and questions. Anyone else take this approach? After reading TBR physics and going to TPR I felt like TPR was much more concise and clear. Thanks for any input guys. Just don't want to waste money buying new TPRH science workbook if my old one is the same.
I have old TPR science workbook. It isn't even hyper learning. So it is prior to whenever they started calling it hyper learning (2009). Is this still good for prep? One person told me the old science workbooks from TPR are the same exact thing essentially as new hyper learning science workbooks. Is this the case? I notice the TPR seems to have more discrete questions than passages for physics..which isn't that great. Or is this because I have old book? Basically want to know if I am fine with this, or if I should try to find newer hyper learning science workbook?
I also have TBR for passages. Started sn2ed a few days ago. I feel like TBR for content is overwhelming!! Does anyone else feel this way?? To the point that they load you with minute detail, you lose big picture. So think I am going to use TPR review books for content, TPR science for passages/?'s, and TBR just for their passages and questions. Anyone else take this approach? After reading TBR physics and going to TPR I felt like TPR was much more concise and clear. Thanks for any input guys. Just don't want to waste money buying new TPRH science workbook if my old one is the same.