Hey guys,
I am a 2nd year HPSP student interested in Oncology. I was wondering about how to navigate the residency and fellowship aspect of mil med.
Couple notes:
I would like not to add extra obligation if necessary (I know the fellowship would be neutral toward payback at best if I go the mil fellowship route)
And I am Air Force. And yes, I get it. I don't need generic comments about how mil med sucks and the Air Force is the worst. I've read enough of this board to know that. At this point, I'm just trying to navigate the system best.
Finally, my goal post-military (whenever that is) would be academic medicine as opposed to private practice. I'm guessing that may affect which option is best.
Onto the options:
The first options involve doing a military residency (since I should have no trouble with IM) and then a military fellowship. As a general rule, how are fellowships in the military for oncology? Would doing one and practicing in the military hurt chances for academic medicine afterwards?
- Straight-through training...yeah right.
-Residency, 2 years IM, maybe get fellowship, and owe two years post-fellowship
-Residency, 4 years IM, then get fellowship and stay in
Any other options besides a military-sponsored civilian (which would add more time)?
The other options involve waiting to do a fellowship after leaving the military.
-Residency, 4 years IM, leave and pursue fellowship- would civilian programs even want me 4 years out of residency? I know for some IM subspecialites, this is more important than others, not sure about oncology.
-GMO tour for 2 years, residency, 2 years IM, leave and pursue fellowship- again, would I run into the continuity problem or any ill will toward military residency and experience (in terms of not good quality)?
-GMO tour 4 years, get out and do my residency and fellowship the civilian route- I didn't sign up to do four and out, but if it's my best chance of getting an academic job, then I may take it if no other option is better. General consensus on this board seems to be that GMO tours can get you into a better civilian residency than coming right out of school would. Is this still true?
Thanks for reading my long, long post. I hope it's not too jumbled. I really do appreciate any (constructive) comments you can provide. Again, I know that not everyone is a fan of mil med. If you feel the need to do some bashing, can you at least make it oncology-specific? Thanks.
I am a 2nd year HPSP student interested in Oncology. I was wondering about how to navigate the residency and fellowship aspect of mil med.
Couple notes:
I would like not to add extra obligation if necessary (I know the fellowship would be neutral toward payback at best if I go the mil fellowship route)
And I am Air Force. And yes, I get it. I don't need generic comments about how mil med sucks and the Air Force is the worst. I've read enough of this board to know that. At this point, I'm just trying to navigate the system best.
Finally, my goal post-military (whenever that is) would be academic medicine as opposed to private practice. I'm guessing that may affect which option is best.
Onto the options:
The first options involve doing a military residency (since I should have no trouble with IM) and then a military fellowship. As a general rule, how are fellowships in the military for oncology? Would doing one and practicing in the military hurt chances for academic medicine afterwards?
- Straight-through training...yeah right.
-Residency, 2 years IM, maybe get fellowship, and owe two years post-fellowship
-Residency, 4 years IM, then get fellowship and stay in
Any other options besides a military-sponsored civilian (which would add more time)?
The other options involve waiting to do a fellowship after leaving the military.
-Residency, 4 years IM, leave and pursue fellowship- would civilian programs even want me 4 years out of residency? I know for some IM subspecialites, this is more important than others, not sure about oncology.
-GMO tour for 2 years, residency, 2 years IM, leave and pursue fellowship- again, would I run into the continuity problem or any ill will toward military residency and experience (in terms of not good quality)?
-GMO tour 4 years, get out and do my residency and fellowship the civilian route- I didn't sign up to do four and out, but if it's my best chance of getting an academic job, then I may take it if no other option is better. General consensus on this board seems to be that GMO tours can get you into a better civilian residency than coming right out of school would. Is this still true?
Thanks for reading my long, long post. I hope it's not too jumbled. I really do appreciate any (constructive) comments you can provide. Again, I know that not everyone is a fan of mil med. If you feel the need to do some bashing, can you at least make it oncology-specific? Thanks.