- Joined
- Oct 8, 2013
- Messages
- 289
- Reaction score
- 110
Hi all,
Here's a little background info about me. I finished all pre-health courses by 2003, then finished pharmacy school in 2009. Took MCAT in 2014, got 30 (10/8/12 cuz English is my second language). Could've been much higher but I was working 56+ hours a week as a pharmacist while studying MCAT for 3 months.
Most DO schools require TWO science faculty letters, but because of the long time elapsed and faculty turnovers, I was only able to get one, getting a second one is practically impossible. I emailed a few schools to see if I could use much more recent employer and DO letters from mere months ago in lieu of the second required science faculty letter, but they were all very rigid and would not make exceptions. (Most MD schools however, allow employer letters to substitute for science faculty letters)
The dilemma is, I have been out of school for so long, even if I were able to get science faculty letters, it'd be like at least 12 years ago when I was a simple and stupid college student, and no way could those letters reflect who I am today as a person, healthcare professional, and med school applicant. This rigid science faculty letter requirement for nontrads who are more than a decade removed from college is just unreasonable, unrealistic, and not right imho. In the end it's those DO schools that lose out.
So how should I go about this? All opinions are appreciated, but I especially want to know adcom's take on that, i.e. Goro, gyngyn, etc.
Thanks in advance!
Here's a little background info about me. I finished all pre-health courses by 2003, then finished pharmacy school in 2009. Took MCAT in 2014, got 30 (10/8/12 cuz English is my second language). Could've been much higher but I was working 56+ hours a week as a pharmacist while studying MCAT for 3 months.
Most DO schools require TWO science faculty letters, but because of the long time elapsed and faculty turnovers, I was only able to get one, getting a second one is practically impossible. I emailed a few schools to see if I could use much more recent employer and DO letters from mere months ago in lieu of the second required science faculty letter, but they were all very rigid and would not make exceptions. (Most MD schools however, allow employer letters to substitute for science faculty letters)
The dilemma is, I have been out of school for so long, even if I were able to get science faculty letters, it'd be like at least 12 years ago when I was a simple and stupid college student, and no way could those letters reflect who I am today as a person, healthcare professional, and med school applicant. This rigid science faculty letter requirement for nontrads who are more than a decade removed from college is just unreasonable, unrealistic, and not right imho. In the end it's those DO schools that lose out.
So how should I go about this? All opinions are appreciated, but I especially want to know adcom's take on that, i.e. Goro, gyngyn, etc.
Thanks in advance!
Last edited: