- Joined
- Aug 16, 2008
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 10
Just interviewed there and really loved the program. Wanted to know if anybody had any opinions (good and bad) about the program, living in Seattle (expense of living, things to do), etc. Thanks!
Quite a bit less than NYC, LA, SF, Boston. Very doable on a resident salary.Everything about the program is great--except the cost of living. I would be very happy there with the clinical experience, research, didactics, and city, but it is expensive.
Can anyone who has trained at UW and then gone on to practice on the East Coast comment? I just want to make sure that I'm not regionally restricting myself long-term. Granted, it'll all play out in the algorithm, so it might not even be an issue.
Agammaglobulin, I tried PMing you, but it wouldn't let me. Can you send me a message as I've got a few questions. Thanks!
UW's website actually says:
"The average hours worked by residents per week are: CBY: 56, CA1: 56, CA2: 55, and CA3: 52.5."
56 hours/week as an intern doesn't sound bad at all, compared to the malignancy rumors and posters above who said you will "work very hard", etc.
Even if those numbers are slightly under-reported, 60h/wk as an intern doesn't sound like hell.
Any thoughts?
I understand you may log your hours in a way that is most efficient, but there seems to be come correlation since the hours are the same in PGY1/2/3 and then a drop off in CA3. All when the hour-logging system is the same. And I can definitely live with a "busy 56 hours" compared to a chill program as long as the hours are that low overall.
So are you trying to do the minimum possible or do you want good training?
56 hours a week is a weak program IMO, and you're only shorting yourself.
I don't think the vast majority of residents work this little- I wonder if the residents at this program are actually really working this little, I doubt it.
Making a blanket statement that 56 hrs a week automatically = weak program is ridiculous. Quality of hours is a gazillion times more important than sheer quantity. I came from an historically cush residency to an ICU fellowship where the anesthesia residents are the workforce, and I've had the opportunity to interact with 15-20 anesthesia residents here over extended periods of time in the ICU and the cardiac ORs. Out of that group there's maybe a handful I would actually let anesthetize me or a family member.
Working 70 hrs a week as a resident means nothing if you're at a center where you get absolutely no autonomy because the surgeons demand attendings/fellows do everything, where you have no time to read or study, and where all those extra hours go towards relieving CRNAs in cysto or EGD. 50-60 hrs/week is plenty if you're actually at a shop that will let you fly solo as a CA-3 (or at least maximize autonomy) from induction to emergence in whipples, esophagectomies, cardiac, high risk OB/peds, cranis etc. The vast majority of my class are in fellowship and a couple are in private practice, and as far as I know not a single soul is crying 'oh woe is me I wish I had worked more hours in residency because I feel so unprepared'
You're entitled to your opinion.
I don't disagree that 70 hours a week automatically means a good program.
50s is a chill program. Jealous