ORGO question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

nassir

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I found a clash of info in TPR and EK books and was hoping someone could tell me which is right and why:

-TPR: As branching increases in hydrocarbons, boiling point AND melting point decreases
-EK: As branching increases in hydrocarbons, boiling point decreases, BUT melting point increases

Thanks!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Short answer: Branching will decrease mp and bp. Condensing and freezing happen for alkanes because of dispersion forces caused by temporary, induced dipoles, which are the only intermolecular forces holding nonpolar molecules like alkanes together in the liquid and solid states. Branched alkanes have smaller dispersion forces compared to straight-chain alkanes of the same MW, so they will be harder to liquify or freeze.

Long answer: Let's imagine that we are cooling down a gaseous alkane like hexane that is straight-chained, versus another of the same MW that is branched, like 2,3-dimethylbutane. Remember that gases don't have any intermolecular interactions, at least not if they're ideal. As we lower the temperature, the molecules stop moving as much, and they begin to have intermolecular interactions that are due to induced, temporary dipoles.

What is an induced, temporary dipole? Well, the electrons in a bond or in an atom are not stationary. They are constantly in motion. Sometimes, by sheer chance, they are not equally distributed on the atom or in the bond, and this inequality of charge forms a dipole. It is temporary because soon thereafter, as the electrons continue to move, they distribute more equally again, and so the dipole goes away. But in the meantime, that short-lived dipole has affected its neighbors, and it has caused similar dipoles to form in them as well. This is why these dipoles are induced. So you can imagine a bunch of molecules, held together by small dipoles that are constantly forming and unforming. But there are always some dipoles present at any given time, and that is what holds the liquid or solid together.

Ok, so now we need to consider what kinds of molecules will have the strongest induced dipoles. The strength of the induced dipoles is directly proportional to the surface areas of the molecules that are coming into contact. This is intuitive, because if contact can be made over a greater area, there is a greater chance that electrons will distribute unequally at some point over that surface, causing the temporary dipole and inducing dipoles in the neighboring molecule. You may know that the shape with the smallest surface area-to-volume ratio is a sphere. So molecules that are more spherical (ie, highly branched) do not have very much surface area relative to molecules that are long and extended (straight chains). That is why branched molecules have weaker dispersion forces versus straight-chains. Since they have weaker dispersion forces, the branched molecules will tend to want to stay in the gaseous phase longer, and you'll have to cool them further to force them to condense into a liquid. This means that branched compounds have a lower bp (condense at a lower temperature) versus straight chains.

As we continue to cool, the molecules continue to move closer and closer together, and their interactions continue to increase. Eventually, we reach a point where they begin to crystallize, or at least form an amorphous solid. So we need to consider how well the molecules pack together at this point. Branched compounds are like little spheres, or like porcupines. It's hard to get them to pack well, and this means that you will have to cool them to a lower temperature to freeze them (lower mp) compared with straight chains, which can stack up nicely, more like a cord of firewood. So the mp of a branched compound will be lower than that of a straight chain, assuming that they have the same MW.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
stoleyerscrubz said:
umm...that was definitely a long answer!!

:thumbup:

lol, that's why I gave one short answer and one long one, in case the long one was more info than y'all wanted to hear. ;)

BTW, for those of you taking Kaplan, you can read about this topic on p. 336 of the BS review notes. It's explained correctly there, too.
 
Top