I don’t understand some things.. I’m not saying those scenario’s didn’t happen, but how in the world did we reach this point where informed consent is close to meaningless?
But also, i’d imagine it’s very difficult to prove a dentist wasn’t operating under standard of care. I mean, where do you draw the line? If you ask 3 different dentists to diagnose something, they’ll give you different answers. Unless it was a very obvious screw up (as an example: doctor drilled bone on lingual plate for a lower wisdom tooth extraction and pt gets paresthesia) but even then, how can someone even really prove if the doctor drilled the lingual plate or the pt didn’t get paresthesia from the injection? I imagine many similar situations like that are hard to prove..
that’s why I don’t understand why an informed consent can’t cover most of the bases.. sometimes, as they say, s**t just happens even though you try to avoid it all costs. Kind of like the second you step out of your house, you’re already at higher risk of catching COVID. As soon as a pt is going to undergo treatment, they’re already at higher risk of adverse events occuring.